INSPIRED AS GIVEN BY INSPIRATION OF GOD IS IN 2 TIMOTHY 3:16 AND SINCE GOD IS PERFECT INERRANT AND INFALLIBLE GOES WITHOUT SAYING,BECAUSE SINCE MAN WROTE WHAT GOD INSPIRED,IF THEY WOULD HAVE WRITTEN SOMETHING DIFFERENT OR CHANGED OR ADDED TO WHAT HE TOLD THEM TO WRITE...GOD BEING OMNIPENT AND ALL POWER Would than have spoken into existance,like he did the world a NEW BIBLE IF AND ONLY IF they would have not been GODS WORDS as he wanted them to be.cause GOD can do anything ..ANYTHING THAT IS that is of his CHARACTER..I mean GOD cannot LIE..or do anything just is UNHOLY OR AGAINST HIS NATURE OR CHARACTER..So that is my answer
The Gideons believe that the Bible is the inspired, infallible, inerrant word of God.
Most Christian theologians consider the Bible to be both infallible and inerrant, meaning that it is without error and completely trustworthy in all matters of faith and practice.
The Bible is considered inerrant, meaning it is without error in its original form, by some religious traditions. It is also considered infallible, meaning it is incapable of leading people astray in matters of faith and practice.
Most Christian denominations consider the Bible to be infallible, meaning it is free from error in matters of faith and practice, but not necessarily inerrant, meaning without any mistakes in all aspects.
The entirety of the Holy Bible. Scripture.
Some believe that the Bible is the word of God because it was literally told to the authors by God himself, and therefore is infallible. Others believe that the Bible was inspired by God and, although it can contain errors of history and science, it is infallible on matters of faith. There is no evidence of either. The Bible contains many errors of history and science, and is therefore not infallible. It contains many contradictions and inconsistencies on theology, and is therefore not even infallible on matters of faith.
Some believe that the Bible is the word of God because it was literally told to the authors by God himself, and therefore is infallible. Others believe that the Bible was inspired by God and, although it can contain errors of history and science, it is infallible on matters of faith. There is no evidence of either. The Bible contains many errors of history and science, and is therefore not infallible. It contains many contradictions and inconsistencies on theology, and is therefore not even infallible on matters of faith.
The only thing that we know of that is defined as infallible is the Pope, he is infallible (preserved from error) when teaching to the entire Church on matters of faith and morals. In this light, the Catechism of the Council of Trent would indeed be considered infallible as it was the teaching of several Popes. However, it is not considered inerrant in the way the Bible is.
Some who believe that the Bible is the word of God say it was literally told to the authors by God himself, and therefore is infallible. Others believe that the Bible was inspired by God and, although it can contain errors of history and science, it is infallible on matters of faith. There is no evidence of either, so neither view can be be put forward as more correct than the other.
The Holy Bible is inspired directly from God and if people follow scripture, they can follow God's teachings for us.
Various men, in various times and places, where inspired to codify the Scripture.
A:The notion of biblical inspiration is generally intended to mean that the Bible is the word of God, who inspired the authors to write down exactly what he commanded them to write. Because the Bible is inspired in this way, it must of course be inerrant, which means that the Bible contains no error of fact or transcription. A secondary meaning, unrelated to inerrancy is that the Bible contains the words of men, who were inspired in what they believed, but what they wrote was not guided by God. In this secondary meaning, the Bible can not be assumed to be inerrant. Calling the Bible inerrant means that if any historical error or other error of fact is found in the Bible, then the entire belief in its inerrancy must be called into question. If the belief in the Bible's inerrancy is applied to an English translation of the Bible, this applies even to errors of translation.Some say that the above rule for inerrancy is too broad and that the Bible contains exactly what God intends to convey, but the absence of error does not necessarily apply to the incidental, scientific, geographical, or historical statements in Scripture.Professor Alley of the University of Richmond is quoted as saying, "While some persons may continue to hold that the historic Christian belief in biblical infallibility and inerrancy is the only valid starting point and framework for a theology of revelation, such contentions should be heard with a smile and incorporated into the bylaws of the Flat Earth Society."