During the first two and a half years after his conversion to Buddhism, Ashoka focused on promoting the principles of non-violence, compassion, and moral governance while still maintaining the traditional authority of a ruler. However, following this initial period, he implemented more extensive reforms, actively promoting Buddhism across his empire and beyond, fostering a culture of religious tolerance, and emphasizing welfare programs for his subjects. His later actions included the establishment of edicts that reflected his commitment to dharma, social justice, and the well-being of all living beings, marking a significant shift towards a more profoundly ethical and humanitarian approach to leadership.
yes
There is no difference. Both have been ordained. However, there is a difference between a priest or monk who has been sanctioned to teach and one who hasn't. It's possible to call those who have been sanctioned to teach "priests" and those who haven't "monks." .
From what I know one of the biggest differences in that in a Hindu temple there will be statues of gods that will be worshiped and in a Buddhist temple there will be statues of Buddha who will be revered but not worshiped since he is not a god.
The Nazi symbol, the swastika, is associated with hate, violence, and racism due to its adoption by the Nazi party during World War II. In contrast, the Buddhist symbol, also a swastika but facing the opposite direction, represents well-being, good fortune, and the cycle of life in Buddhist traditions. The key difference lies in the historical and cultural contexts in which these symbols are used.
Intensional actions refer to actions that are done with a specific purpose or goal in mind, while intentional actions refer to actions that are done deliberately or consciously.
Buddhist is all about the rice and ping pong in the ching chong with ur ding dongs, but Hindu is all about Tilak Patel's teachings and way of Curry.
From my knowledge sherpas are primarily buddhist, while porters come from areas like Pakistan, and Afganistan.
The difference is we don't say "angry at." We say mad at or angry with. You can be angry with a person or their actions, you can be angry at a situation.
A buddha is someone who has found out how to attain enlightenment for themselves. An Arahant is someone who was told how to do it by someone else.
confusion between somebody's actions and words: a confusing difference between the way somebody behaves and what somebody says.
There is none. Your actions and your conduct mean the same thing.
The difference is very clear from the question itself. Violence movies are action movies including violence actions. romance movies are movies including romantic stories and love actions.