Rule utilitarianism is like when your girlfriend gives you a bj and you can not bust
Utilitarianism is a way of life, where one determines the right actions to make. The most common example of utilitarianism is the U.S dropping the atomic bombs on Japan after WWII.
The noun utilitarianism is used as a subject or an object; for example: Subject: Utilitarianism is included in this philosophy course. Object: Part of this philosophy course covers utilitarianism.
Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions to determine what is morally right, while rule utilitarianism emphasizes following rules that lead to the greatest overall happiness. An example of act utilitarianism would be a doctor deciding to save the life of a patient in critical condition, even if it means breaking hospital rules. On the other hand, an example of rule utilitarianism would be a society adopting a rule that prohibits stealing, as following this rule generally leads to greater overall happiness even if there are occasional exceptions where stealing might seem justified.
One example that illustrates the differences between act and rule utilitarianism is the scenario of lying. In act utilitarianism, an individual would consider lying acceptable if it results in the greatest overall happiness in a specific situation. However, in rule utilitarianism, lying is generally considered wrong because following a rule of honesty tends to lead to greater overall happiness in the long run.
Any form of government would be an alternative to Utilitarianism. You could have anything from Communism to a Democratic Republic all the way to an Oligarchy.
It collapses into Act-Utilitarianism.
act and rule utilitarianism.
fundamental and secondary utilitarianism
The main difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism is that act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions to determine what is morally right, while rule utilitarianism emphasizes following general rules that lead to the greatest overall happiness or utility for society.
utilitarianism
Some recommended books on utilitarianism include "Utilitarianism" by John Stuart Mill, "The Methods of Ethics" by Henry Sidgwick, and "Utilitarianism: For and Against" by J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams.
No. Utilitarianism is an idea supported by philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, which says that an action is moral if it maximises utility (either if it makes more people happy than unhappy, or if it makes people happier). Therefore, some things that are seen as virtuous (such as telling the truth and being kind) might be seen as immoral by utilitarians. For example, a tradtional example used by people who do not agree with utilitarianism is where there is a group of people who want an innocent man to be killed (maybe they think he has done something wrong). Utilitarians would argue that the moral thing to do is to kill the man, because it will make the group happy. But the traditional idea of virtue would say that killing the man is wrong, and not a virtuous thing to do.