In general there is very little difference between the two. A church is considered "nondenominational" if it has no formal connection to a formal denomination; it may belong to a group or "fellowship" of like-minded congregations, but said fellowship is not recognized as a denomination, and rarely does such a fellowship have anything but a rudimentary overseeing government. A church may call itself "interdenominational" if it tries to appeal to people from a variety of different denominational backgrounds. These churches may be nondemoninational as well, or they may belong to a denomination that tries to minimize the differences between denominations, focusing on a base faith, for example, in Christ. Details of belief systems between different nondenominational churches, as well as interdenominational churches and organizations, will vary greatly, depending on the backgrounds and components of the individual congregations.
A non-denominational church is not affiliated with any specific Christian denomination and operates independently. An inter-denominational church, however, may have members from various Christian denominations and seeks to promote unity among different Christian traditions.
"Nondenominational" typically refers to a church or organization that is not affiliated with any particular Christian denomination. "Interdenominational" refers to activities, organizations, or events that involve members from different Christian denominations coming together for a common purpose.
Oh, dude, so like, Nazarenes are a specific denomination within Christianity, while nondenominational refers to churches that aren't affiliated with any specific denomination. It's kind of like the difference between being part of a club with a set of rules and being that cool loner who does their own thing. But hey, as long as they're all spreading good vibes, who really cares, right?
Methodists are a little more traditional in their ceremonies (communion, reciting the Lord's prayer, etc.), but the belief system is the same. Baptisms are similar, but with the same ceremonious differences (Methodism being more formal than non-denominationalism) It's really just a question of formalities
The difference between our perspectives on this issue lies in our individual viewpoints and beliefs.
The official beliefs of the Assemblies of God are in the related link. Beliefs of nondenominational churches vary from church to church. Some may be very close to the Assemblies of God in their doctrines and practices; others may have substantial differences.
it depends on your religious beliefs
Ignorance is not knowing, whilst erroneous beliefs are more akin to delusions, which are faulty beliefs.
De re beliefs refer to beliefs about specific objects or individuals, while de dicto beliefs refer to beliefs about general concepts or properties.
The difference between the two were that the pilgrims practiced religious freedom with British beliefs. On the contrary, the Wampanoag were Pagans (aka practiced witchcraft).
De dicto beliefs refer to beliefs about the content of a statement or proposition, while de re beliefs refer to beliefs about the actual object or thing being referred to in the statement.
convention: a treaty/agreement made by many people gathered together with similar beliefs constitution: framework for an organization; statement of beliefs