0
What else can I help you with?
Is there good consequences for evil acts?
Not at all.It is impossible. if it is true that a n evil act has good consequence there is no evil act exists.An evil act will always consequence a bad and evil end.
Is it justifiable to perform an evil act to achieve good consequences?
From a philosophical, ethical and moral point of view, it is never justifiable to perform an evil act in order to achieve good consequences. Official Church positions usually conform to this, although there are numerous instances of Christians performing evil in the belief that it was justified for the good of the Church.
What is worse suffering or evil?
Usually suffering is the result of committing some evil act. Our conscience gets the beter of us and so we suffer from guilt at having committed evil.
What does Act III about the murder of Banquo in Macbeth suggest about the effects of evil on evildoers?
The murder of Banquo in Act III of Macbeth suggests that committing evil acts can have severe psychological consequences on the evildoers. Macbeth's guilt and paranoia over Banquo's murder lead to a descent into madness and an inability to find peace. This highlights the destructive nature of evil actions on the individuals who commit them.
Can evil people act good and can good people act evil?
yes i know one
What do you call the act of delivering from sin or saving from evil?
Redemption is the act of delivering from sin or saving from evil.
How do you imprison an ancient evil?
frame the evil in an act they did not commit
Utilitarians evaluate the morality of an act by examining the?
consequences of the act.
How did the government and catholic bishop tried to evade the consequences of the secularization act?
how did the catholic bishop evade the consequences of the secularization act
How do you act evil?
suspecios, acting munipulitive, keeping a grin Don't 'act evil'! You may end up hated if you do.
What is a sentence with the word evil?
The devil gave an evil chuckle.There was something evil in his eyes.It was an act of pure evil.
What does this act suggest about the effects of evil on evildoers?
It suggests that those who are evil don't necessarily get away with being evil but eventually have evil done unto them.
