Technically, they are both pretty important (that's why they're in The Bible to begin with.) I like the New Testament better because the books Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are about the gospel.
It is not a case of one being more important then the other.
The Old Testament is the original religious scripture of the Jews The new testament a much more modern book was put together about 350 years after the death of Christ and claims to be a continuation of the old testament most of the rules and morals from the old testament carry on into the Cristian teachings. the same goes for the Muslim religion it however also uses part of the new testament.
So I would say the whole lot is built up on the original old testament.
The Bible is comprised of the Old Testament and the New Testament. The New Testament is part of the Bible. The Bible is made up of 66 books: 39 in the Old Testament and 27 In the New Testament.
Corinthians is in the New Testament of the Bible.
Paul is found in the New Testament.
No. The Bible consists of the Old and New Testament.
Psalms is located in the Old Testament of the Bible.
The New Testament begins in the Bible after the Old Testament, with the first book being the Gospel of Matthew.
The bible.
The second book of the Bible is Exodus, in the Old Testament. It is found in between Genesis and Leviticus. In the New Testament, it is Mark. It is found between Matthew and Luke.
There are two testaments in the Bible. The Old Testament is before Christ was born, the New Testament is after Christ was born. And, yes, the Old Testament and the New Testament, together, are the Bible.
Colossians is found in the New Testament of the Bible.
Corinthians is found in the New Testament of the Bible.
Jesus is only foun in the new testament :) Read a bible!