The Epistle of Barnabas was rejected by early Christian leaders because it contained teachings that were considered to be inconsistent with orthodox Christian beliefs and teachings. These teachings included allegorical interpretations of the Old Testament and a rejection of the Jewish law, which were seen as deviating from traditional Christian doctrine.
The author Barnabas is traditionally credited with writing the Epistle of Barnabas, an early Christian text that offers spiritual and moral exhortations. This epistle is not included in the New Testament canon.
James Muilenburg has written: 'Specimens of Biblical literature' -- subject(s): Bible as literature 'The literary relations of the Epistle of Barnabas and the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles' -- subject(s): Didache, Epistle of Barnabas
Roman Catholic AnswerThere is a Gospel of Barnabas, and an Epistle of Barnabas, and an Acts of Barnabas; none was accepted into the canon of Scripture which was decided by Pope Damasus I (366-384) and the Council of Rome (382).
Paul referred to Barnabas in his First Epistle to the Corinthians and in his Epistle to the Galatians, in both cases implying that the recipients already knew of Barnabas. It is hardly possible that Paul would have written of Barnabas in this way, unless Barnabas was a real person. Barnabas is also mentioned in Colossians, but the clear majority of biblical scholars regard Colossians as pseudographical, so this epistle does not provide proof for Barnabas.Acts made Paul a lesser character in the history of the early church, one who did not act on his own initiative but sought the authority of Peter and James on important matters. Whereas Paul had represented Barnabas as a loyal assistant, Acts had Barnabas become a mentor assigned to Paul by the Jerusalem elders in order to educate him and play a part in the Gentile church as an equal to Paul. There is no proof outside Acts that Barnabas was ever more than Paul's assistant.
Ferdinand-Rupert Prostmeier has written: 'Der Barnabasbrief' -- subject(s): Commentaries, Criticism, interpretation, Epistle of Barnabas
The thirteen epistles that are almost certainly written by Paul, in order, are: Epistle to the Romans First Epistle to the Corinthians Second Epistle to the Corinthians Epistle to the Galatians Epistle to the Ephesians Epistle to the Philippians Epistle to the Colossians First Epistle to the Thessalonians Second Epistle to the Thessalonians First Epistle to Timothy Second Epistle to Timothy Epistle to Titus Epistle to Philemon although some theologians doubt that some letters (eg Ephesians) are written by him as the style of writing is different from the others. The fourteenth letter, the Epistle to the Hebrews - is unlikely to have been written by Paul. He doesn't claim to have written it nor is the style of writing his. Pauline authorship is rejected by modern scholarship and even in the early church its authorship was debated.
Pierre Prigent has written: 'Les testimonia dans le chistianisme primitif' -- subject(s): Criticism, interpretation, Epistle of Barnabas 'La fin de Jerusalem'
Reidar Hvalvik has written: 'The struggle for scripture and covenant' -- subject(s): Christianity, Christianity and other religions, Criticism, interpretation, Epistle of Barnabas, History, Judaism, Relations
Some who are sceptical about the gospels story say that the twelve disciples represent the twelve tribes of Israel. Some even go further and say that, in both cases, the twelve derives from the twelve star signs in the heavens.Answer 2If the question "represent" is intended as "come from", i.e. did each of Jesus' twelve disciples come from a different tribe, then the answer is: No. All of Jesus' followers were either Levites or Judahites. The other tribes were not represented.Answer/Maybe.According to the Epistle of Barnabas, who wrote: '.. to whom the Lord gave authority to preach his Gospel : being at the beginning twelve, to signify the tribes, because there were twelve tribes of Israel.' Note that the earliest known version of the Epistle of Barnabas is from the 4th century (~300 years after Barnabas walked the earth) and is only only ascribed to Barnabas by tradition so its authenticity is unknown.
The New Testament states that Mark had two friends in the apostle Paul as well as well as the cousin of his Barnabas we can find it in the epistle of Paul to the Colossians chapter 4 verse10.There was another friend called Aristarchus.
Mark the author of the gospel of Mark had the apostle Paul his cousin Barnabas , as it is mentioned in the book of the epistle of Paul to the Colossi ans chapter 4 verse 10, there was another friend and worker Aristarchus as well.
Epistles to the Thessalonians written from Corinth. Epistles to the Corinthians. Epistle to the Galations. Epistle to the Romans written from Corinth. Epistle to the Philippians. Epitle to the Colossians. Epistle to Philemon. Epistle to the Hebrews. Epistle to Titus.