It's unnecessary, so I don't really know. I think they think of it as an upgrade, like with a car. You can get a regular baby, or a baby deluxe edition with a mutilated penis. Maybe that's it?
Who knows, There is no religious reason why Christians should have their penis mutilated with circumcision
i dont know go check fag
if the child is not circumcised I segest you dont have it done before you have a look at the related link( Medical Studies on Circumcision ) belowonly if you hit them with it
He notes that certain people getting circumcised and boasting about it are not obeying the law and therefore have their priorities wrong. He advises that the most important thing is to become a new creation in Jesus not circumcision. The context is that Paul had advised adult converts that they don't need to get circumcised in order to become Christians. As the first Christians were Jewish and were therefore circumcised it was assumed that to join them circumcision was required by adult male converts. However Paul considered that getting circumcised as an adult (no anaesthesis in those days) was a much heavier burden than the apostles had had (being Jewish they had been circumcised close to birth and wouldn't even remember it). Therefore he didn't consider it necessary for them to get circumcised in order to belong to the religion.
No. Paul's Epistles in the New Testament discuss the question of whether or not Christians need to be circumcised, and he says that they don't. For this reason circumcision is not a part of Christianity. Some Christian boys have been circumcised for other reasons, but there is no religious reason for circumcision.
Because some are circumcised and some are not.
Christians dont really "have" Lent its more like a tradition. Christians are preparing for the Death and Resurection of Jesus Christ
they dont muslims do
well i dont know
i dont knopw but i love him very much
He is definitely circumcised
Yes he might have been circumcised.