Monks and friars owned no property as part of their commitment to a life of poverty, which was central to their religious vocation. This practice allowed them to focus on spiritual matters and serve their communities without the distractions of material wealth. By renouncing personal possessions, they embodied ideals of humility and reliance on divine providence, fostering a deeper connection to their faith and the people they served. Additionally, it promoted a sense of solidarity among members of their communities, emphasizing shared resources and collective well-being.
No. Joint property with the right of survivorship is a non-probate asset. It may help to think of jointly owned property this way: You both owned the whole property. When the other person died their interest in the property simply vanished. You already owned the property and so you "inherited" nothing.
Spanish familial and property records 'seemed' to contradict what was believed to be, in that backward era, the 'historical' records of the Bible.
do not know. but i think there must has privately owned rentals for leasing.
He had a ranch in California where he spent a lot of time. I do not think he owned property in Montana.
Although we tend to think of an estate as being all the property owned by a person at the time of their death, a living estate is all the property owned by a living person.If you are thinking of a life estate see related question link.
Property is the ownership of a thing is the right of one or more persons to possess and use it to the exclusion of others. Goods refer to what is owned.
I think they owned property or buildings that people paid rent for.
I think their just called monestaries. Nuns (female monks) lived in abbeys.
I think Basilian and Benedictine rules were put in place for monks to follow the rules
I think they have priests & monks.
I think one of them was Sir Walter Raleigh
I think it was because only white men who owned property could vote or be elected representatives