Since scholars say that the Mark mentioned in the epistles was not really the author of the Gospel later attributed to him, there are two 'Marks' and therefore two answers to this question.
1 Peter 5:13 says that Mark, presumably the same Mark as mentioned by Paul, was the author's son. If the author of this epistle was really the disciple Peter, we could say that there was a good chance of Mark having met Jesus, perhaps as a young child. However, scholars say that the epistle now known as 1 Peter was written pseudonymously and not really by Peter. There is no reason to believe that Mark, Paul's "fellow-labourer", had really met Jesus personally.
The Gospel According to Mark was originally written anonymously and only attributed to Mark by Papias, bishop of Hieropolis in Asia Minor, around 130 CE. For convenience, scholars continue to call this anonymous author 'Mark', but the evidence of the Gospel itself is that 'Mark' never met Jesus.
Yes, according to The Bible, Mark was a disciple of Jesus and one of the Four Evangelists who wrote the Gospel of Mark. He likely had firsthand knowledge of Jesus and his teachings.
It isn't known if Mark knew Jesus. There is some thought that he did, but all that is known is that he was aquainted with those who had known Jesus personally.
The Gospel of Mark is traditionally believed to have been written by John Mark, who was not one of the twelve apostles and likely did not personally know Jesus during his earthly ministry.
Jesus to me is my personal savior
Mark's Gospel is considered a biography of Jesus Christ. It was written by John Mark, who compiled the teachings and events of Jesus' life based on his own experiences and the accounts of others.
The Gospel according to Mark is often referred to as the Memoirs of Peter because it is believed to be based on the teachings of Peter, one of Jesus's disciples. Mark is said to have written down Peter's recollections of Jesus's life and ministry.
AnswerThe earliest of the New Testament gospels, now known as Mark's Gospel, did not include an account of the birth of Jesus. THese accounts were added by the authors of Matthew and Luke.The author of John knew Luke's account of the birth of Jesus, but did not include it in his gospel. In fact, he suggests that he did not even believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.
The gospel of Mark in the second gospel chronologically, and he may not have been one of the 12 apostles, but he certainly had a spiritual walk with Jesus. His mothers house was the place the disciples met after Jesus' resurrection. Some believe it was her house the last supper was eaten in with Jesus and his disciples. If this is so, Mark probably did know Jesus personally while he was on earth.
If u were personally commissioned personally from the Lord Christ Jesus.
Yes and no. Yes in that He believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. No in that He did not personally know Jesus.
Yes and no. Yes in that He believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. No in that He did not personally know Jesus.
As far as Jesus is concerned, the Church is the people who know him personally. Denominations don't apply.
Not the Old Testament writers but Matthew, John, Peter, Jude, and James surely did. Perhaps Mark and Timothy as well. Luke and Paul did not personally travel with Him but may have seen Him.
i don't personally know but in the time of "Jesus", Jesus meant Joseph so there could be many people known as "Jesus"
Jesus to me is my personal savior
If you know this person, I suggest you ask him personally, by phone, or something like that.
AnswerWe can not be certain that anyone invented Jesus Christ.If anyone invented Jesus of Nazareth, it would have been the author of Mark's Gospel, which appears to have been written in 70 CE. At least we know that the other New Testament gospels were based, directly or indirectly, on Mark, and that those authors knew nothing of the life and mission of Jesus apart from what they read in Mark.Even if Mark invented Jesus of Nazareth, Hebrews seems to predate the Gospel of Mark and yet it refers to Jesus. But Hebrews refers to Jesus as a High Priest in heaven, not as a human who lived on earth in the recent past. Arguably, the Jesus of Hebrews was not the Jesus of Nazareth whom Mark describes.Wa also know that Paul taught of Jesus Christ at least two decades before the Gospel of Mark. Once again, it seems that Paul may have been speaking of a more spiritual Jesus than the gospel Jesus. And he knew nothing of the life of Jesus of Nazareth, as Mark describes after the death of Paul.So, if anyone invented Jesus of Nazareth it was the evangelist now known as Mark. But he did not invent the Jesus of Paul's epistles, nor the Jesus of Hebrews. The origin of this Jesus remains a mystery.
By reading through the Biblical accounts in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
As far as I know Mark went to Egypt after the crucifixion.