yes
In ancient Rome, both the rich and the poor participated in the same religious practices and ceremonies. However, the rich individuals had more resources to dedicate to elaborate offerings, sacrifices, and building temples, while the poor had limited means to participate in extravagant religious displays. Overall, both classes shared a common belief system and worshiped the same gods, but their level of engagement and contribution varied based on their economic status.
As far as Gandhi was concerned, he made a social choice to live a simple life. Gandhi was a lawyer and was driven to become a civil rights activist because of the supremacist and oppressive conduct of the British Imperialists. His choice to live a simple life was a part of his strategy of civil disobedience in the terrible struggle for independence from the oppressive colonialists.
Yes, St. Francis is commonly used to refer to St. Francis of Assisi, who was an Italian Catholic friar known for his love of nature and animals, and his dedication to serving the poor.
India has a high percentage of people who follow Hinduism as their religion.
No, Abraham and Moses are not the same person. Abraham is considered the patriarch of monotheistic religions like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, known for his covenant with God. Moses, on the other hand, is considered a prophet in Judaism and Islam, known for leading the Israelites out of Egypt and receiving the Ten Commandments.
People have always made differences about what poor and rich wore but if poor people ere equal to rich then both wear the same things.
The same way they do now. The poor cursed the rich and the rich cursed the poor.
Rich people smoke for the same reason poor and middle class people smoke, because they want to.
Rich tudors had silk and cotton robes, and poor tudors had, well, rags.
Rich and poor people used the exact same goods
yes
Both poor and rich had the same taxes, and the poor were getting more poor.
the same as the rich and poor
Yes they did. They ate the same types of food.
If they produce in poor countries and hire workers from that poor country then they dont have to pay them as much because to them a dollar is alot. If they did it in they're country they would have to pay employees more. It's also good advertising.
Mali, is pretty much the same as the rest of Africa. Some parts are incredibly rich and other parts very poor. The people are just the same as you and me though.
The same as a rich Muslim can eat.