How could the Crusades change a serfs’ life?
A peasant bound to the soil, also known as serfdom, was a system in feudal societies where peasants were tied to the land they worked on and were required to provide labor and goods to the landowner in exchange for protection and the right to farm the land. They had limited rights and freedoms, and their status was hereditary, passing from generation to generation.
Peasants who were bound to a manor were known as serfs or villeins. They were required to work the land and pay dues to the lord of the manor in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land. Serfs were not free to leave the manor without the lord's permission.
Serf's weren't freed and the modern life has nothing to compare with the middle ages.
The diet of a serf was mainly porridge, cheese, black bread, and a few home-grown vegetables. Although not technically a slave, a serf was bound to a lord for life. He could own no property and needed the lord's permission to marry.
The slave trade was introduced and the african-Anericans could take over the serf work while the real men fought for their beliefs
1) If a serf could run away for a year and one day, it was considered free. 2) if the noble gave the serf permission, it could stop working on the land
Serfs become fat when they eat pigs because that was all they could afford.
The life of a serf was work all day mabey some fun but when the sun went down so did they.
If a serf's land was sold, the serf typically lost their home and livelihood, as they were bound to the land and had limited rights. The new landowner would assume control over the serf, often imposing new obligations or terms of service. This could lead to significant upheaval in the serf's life, potentially resulting in displacement and loss of social status. Additionally, the sale could disrupt established relationships within the community, as the serf's ties to the land and local economy were often deeply rooted.
The word "serf" means slave and a monk was of the clergy. They were different people with different stations in life.
A possible antonym of serf could be "free person" or "freeman," as a serf is a person who is bound to the land and essentially owned by a lord, whereas a free person has autonomy and is not bound to servitude.
All the prop serf protected Europe life and helped Hebert live
A slave was owned by his master. He had no wages, no freedom and was bound to serve him for life. A serf was tied to the land held by his lord. He could farm but he could not share in the profits and could never leave his lord for a new one. A peasant would farm for his lord and did share to some extend in the profit but he could also sell his labour or anything like vegetables he grew aside from what he grew for his lord. He had a better chance of actually becoming more than what he was than either a slave or a serf.
A slave was owned by his master. He had no wages, no freedom and was bound to serve him for life. A serf was tied to the land held by his lord. He could farm but he could not share in the profits and could never leave his lord for a new one. A peasant would farm for his lord and did share to some extend in the profit but he could also sell his labour or anything like vegetables he grew aside from what he grew for his lord. He had a better chance of actually becoming more than what he was than either a slave or a serf.