People can worship without being persecuted.
The Pilgrims sought religious freedom from the Church of England, prompting their migration to America. The Puritans, on the other hand, sought to create a society based on their strict religious beliefs and did not necessarily support freedom of religion for other groups.
No, the Puritans in Massachusetts did not believe in freedom of religion. They sought to establish a community based on their strict interpretation of Christianity, and those who did not conform were often persecuted or expelled. Their goal was to create a society that adhered to Puritan beliefs and practices.
No--look what happened when people tried to outlaw religion--followers cling onto it even more... Not a good idea; it will make you enemies that you don't need. Although removing religion from society has been tried before, it failed because some people don't want to give it up, some can't bear to be without the thought of an afterlife and some just can't think for themselves. Even if religion should be eliminated, doing so is impossible.
Complete freedom of religion varies by country and is often impacted by laws and societal norms. Some countries protect freedom of religion as a fundamental right, while others may place restrictions or favor certain religions. It is essential to consider the specific context when discussing the extent of freedom of religion in a particular location.
A benefit of having freedom of religion is that people can choose what religion to follow without fear of being persecuted. Also, people have to learn to accept that religion because there is nothing they can do about it. If we didn't have freedom of religion you wouldn't be asking this question because you'd know the answer! Life would be boring, except of course from the seeking out of people who refuse to follow the chosen religion. There are many examples of what happens without freedom of religion in History, and still today. Mary Queen of Scots and Lady Jane Grey (the Nine Days Queen) are just two examples out of many.
i believe freedom of speech and freedom of religion constitute a free society . ;) :D
Religion was government
Thomas Jefferson, a prominent Virginian and Founding Father, strongly advocated for freedom of religion and freedom of the press. He believed that these rights were essential for a democratic society and were fundamental to individual liberty. Jefferson's commitment to these principles is exemplified in his authorship of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and his influence on the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Voltaire was a Deist, believing in a supreme being who created the universe but did not interfere in human affairs. He was critical of organized religion and its influence on society, advocating for reason, tolerance, and freedom of thought.
It gave American Society: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, Equality, and Fraternity.
Less and less it appears.
Freedom of religion
No. It is a contradiction in terms to think of freedom without freedom of religion, just as it would be a contradiction in terms to think of freedom without freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and so on. Freedom means not having to follow any one religion, nor having the values of any one religion imposed on society at large.
everyone has freedom of religion
Still value religious freedom
Lenin viewed religious freedom as a complex issue, seeing it as both a personal right and a potential tool for social control. He believed that while individuals should be free to practice their religion, institutionalized religion could pose a threat to the socialist state by promoting ideologies that conflicted with communist principles. Consequently, Lenin and the Bolsheviks promoted a secular state and implemented policies to diminish the influence of religion, viewing it as a remnant of bourgeois society. Ultimately, he aimed for a society where religion would eventually wither away as socialism progressed.