No. Both are included below so the reader can read them both and see the few similarities as well as the major differences.
Even if it was word for word this would mean nothing except that Mary, whose words were recorded by Luke was a Godly young woman who read her Bible and the words she knew came out of her heart at that moment.
As it is, what Mary said in Luke is a beautiful testimony to her Godliness and humility.
Luke_1:46-55">Luke 1:46-5546And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord,47And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
48For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.
49For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name.
50And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation.
51He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.
52He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.
53He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.
54He hath helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy;
55As he spake to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed for ever.
1_Samuel_2:1-10">1 Samuel 2:1-101And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the LORD, mine horn is exalted in the LORD: my mouth is enlarged over mine enemies; because I rejoice in thy salvation.2There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.
3Talk no more so exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the LORD is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed.
4The bows of the mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are girded with strength.
5They that were full have hired out themselves for bread; and they that were hungry ceased: so that the barren hath born seven; and she that hath many children is waxed feeble.
6The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.
7The LORD maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.
8He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD's, and he hath set the world upon them.
9He will keep the feet of his saints, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.
10The adversaries of the LORD shall be broken to pieces; out of heaven shall he thunder upon them: the LORD shall judge the ends of the earth; and he shall give strength unto his king, and exalt the horn of his anointed.
Of course, Luke the physician and companion of Paul was unlikely to have been the real author of this Gospel or of Acts of the Apostles, both of which were originally anonymous until attributed to him later in the second century. Luke 1:2 gives us a summary of how our 'Luke' gathered his information for the Gospel: "Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word." In other words, the information was delivered to Luke's community ("us") in written form through a chain of writers, the earliest of which Luke believed to have been eyewitnesses.We now know that the writings that were delivered to Luke were Mark's Gospel and the hypothetical 'Q' document (it is 'hypothetical' because we have no extant copy, although its former existence is almost universally accepted by scholars). Luke also found information in the Old Testament to be useful in writing his gospel.
A:In spite of the later attribution to the apostles whose names they now bear, all the New Testament gospels were written anonymously. It is widely accepted among scholars that the author of Lukerelied on Mark's Gospel for everything he knew about the life and mission of Jesus, copying much of the material in exactly the same words in the Greek language. There is no better evidence for this than the 'Missing Block' in Luke's Gospel. Luke's Gospel does not incorporate any material from Mark 6:47 to Mark 8:27a, a total of 74.5 verses that were probably on exactly 13 pages of Greek text missing from the copy of Mark's Gospel relied on by the author of Luke. This Missing Block results in the curious conjunction found in Luke 9:18 "And it came to pass as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him: and he asked them ..." These clauses are more meaningful when found in Mark at the start and end of the Missing Block. The author of Luke also relied on the hypothetical 'Q' document for sayings attributed to Jesus. Luke appears to have used the works of Josephus to provide historical background material, certainly for Acts of the Apostles and most probably for the Gospel.
The Gospel of Luke, as with all the New Testament gospels, was originally written anonymously and only attributed to the apostle whose name it now bears, later in the second century. Scholars say that there is no good reason to believe that the apostle Luke was really the author of the Gospel that bears his name, and in fact it was written around the end of the first century, far too late to have been written by a companion of the apostle Paul. For convenience, the author continues to be called 'Luke', but we can not say that that he learnt about Jesus from Paul or any of the apostles.As the second century progressed and copies of all four gospels became readily available for comparison, the Church Fathers began to realise that there was a literary dependence among the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. They concluded that Matthew was written first and that Mark and Luke were copied from Matthew. Modern scholars now realise that Mark predates the other gospels and that Matthew and Luke were copied from it. Whenever Matthew and Luke agree with Mark, they do so with remarkable consistency, often using exactly the same words in the Greek language, something not possible if the authors were relying on oral testimony or Aramaic sources. the final proof is that Luke has a 'Missing Block' - a series of probably thirteen pages missing from the copy of Mark's Gospel that the author of Luke relied on for his knowledge of the life and mission of Jesus. The Missing Block results in the curious conjunction found in Luke 9:18 "And it came to pass as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him: and he asked them ..." These clauses are found in Mark at the start and end of the Missing Block.However, Mark does not explain all the material about Jesus in Luke's Gospel, so there must be at least another source that Luke used. Matthew and Luke are believed to have copied many parables and other sayings material from the hypothetical 'Q' document, which was a list of sayings attributed to Jesus, but without any information as to when or where Jesus spoke these sayings. As a result, the two authors each had to improvise his own context for the sayings. The sayings from Q are not in Mark because its author was probably unaware of them.There is also material that is unique to Luke, for which there is no certain source. It is reasonably well established that the author used material from the work the first century Jewish historian, Josephus in writing Acts of the Apostles, and is likely to have also used material from the same source in writing the Gospel. He used the census under Quirinius as background and as a reason for Mary and Joseph travelling from Nazareth to Bethlehem although that census took place ten years after the death of King Herod, leading Raymond E. Brown to say (An Introduction to the New Testament) that, although Luke likes to set his Christian drama in the context of events from antiquity, sometimes he does so inaccurately. Others believe that the works of Josephus were the most likely source available to Luke for information about the census and other background information.Thus, Luke learnt about Jesus from Mark's Gospel and the Q document, and added background information from the historical publications of Josephus. Apart from the historical background, we can not say who told Luke stories such as those about Jesus' birth or his resurrection appearances and ascension into heaven. Some of this material is considered unlikely to be historically true.
IT IS that mathew and luke are almost literal copies of mark in greek. greek is translated from hebrew which is what jesus spoke. its not possible for three different translators to translate another language with the same exact wording. the solution is that it is a huge problem with the reliablility of the gospels.
If the original last will and testament cannot be found, you can try to locate a copy of the will with the deceased's attorney, at the local probate court, or in safe deposit boxes. If a copy cannot be found, state laws will dictate the distribution of the estate based on intestacy laws.
No. Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus did'nt copy any song from anyone else. All the songs she sings like Best Of Both Worlds and The Climb are originally hers. For questions like these you can go onto snopes.com. its a helpful website.
Sam bailey Nicholas McDonald Luke Friend Rough Copy Tamera Foster Hannah Barett Sam Callahan Abi Alton
Yes.
It simply means to make a copy of a song from a CD and copy it to your computer.
Edit Copy; Edit Paste
copy of jazz chant title a musical song
No. You know why? Because that's stealing someone's song idea. You can't just copy it. Even "if",you copy the song and don't share it. It's still stealing someone's song idea. It's "their",property of "their",song. You here me people!?!?!? You here me?!?!?!
== ==
Hearts on Fire - Cut Copy song - was created on 2007-06-23.
The rights to copy and sell the recording of a song could be sold by the writer to another party
no way!
How can I get the music/lyrics to the song, " Our Delaware."