0
By the standards of the day not at all. Having said that, all war is barbaric, some just less so. Only three cities were destroyed with fire, since the Israelites came to live in the land and to 'inhabit cities which you did not build'. These cities, Jericho, Ai, and Hazor were all strategically central. They came not to plunder and ravage but to dwell in the land permanently. The inhabitants of the land did not have to fight. Some, like the Gibeonites ended up being servants to Israel (albeit by a clever strategy).
Some of the inhabitants evidently chose to move elsewhere and others were not conquered till later, under David. In all, when one considers the utter barbarity of the later Assyrians, and the evidence from Archaeology of the utter depravity of those inhabitants they replaced (many would be in the prisons of most countries today for their depraved acts) it was 'mild' as far as wars go.
To make it plain, the exaggerated pictures of destructive genocide are factually exaggerated and do not give a true picture of what actually happened. The latter picture is closer to the truth since it wasn't a massively destructive 'slash and burn' type of thing, although the evidence is there in the three above-mentioned sites (when correctly identified, especially in the case of Ai).
Summary:
In terms of military conquests and in the light of the many that had occurred already in that region it was not particularly barbaric. But, to be honest, all war is barbaric. This is why the inhabitants had the opportunity to flee. Those who suffered most were those who resisted the most.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
The conquest of Canaan as described in The Bible involved warfare, destruction, and displacement of the Canaanite peoples. From a modern perspective, these actions can be seen as barbaric due to the violence and destruction involved. However, it is important to consider the historical context and the beliefs and practices of the time when evaluating the conquest of Canaan.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where was the first place tabernacle rested in Canaan?
The first place the tabernacle rested in Canaan was at a location called Gilgal in the region of Jericho. This site served as the base for the Israelites as they began their conquest of the land of Canaan under the leadership of Joshua.
What are the four major theories of the Israelite conquest of canaan?
The four major theories of the Israelite conquest of Canaan are the military conquest theory, the peaceful infiltration theory, the peasant revolt theory, and the gradual migration theory. Each theory proposes a different perspective on how the Israelites established themselves in the land of Canaan.
What Books in the Bible can you find the conquest of Canaan?
The conquest of Canaan is primarily described in the books of Joshua and Judges in the Bible. These books detail the Israelites' military campaigns led by Joshua to capture the land of Canaan, as well as the subsequent period of settlement and conflict under the leadership of various judges.
Is Barack in the book of judges?
No, Barack is not mentioned in the Book of Judges in the Bible. The Book of Judges primarily focuses on the period of time between the conquest of Canaan and the establishment of the monarchy in ancient Israel.
Which tribe does caleb come from?
Caleb is often associated with the tribe of Judah. He was one of the twelve spies sent by Moses to explore the land of Canaan, and he showed great faith in God's promise of victory. After the Exodus, Caleb also played a key role in the conquest of the Promised Land.
When was The Conquest of Canaan created?
The Conquest of Canaan was created on 1921-08-21.
What is Anak in terms of Canaan?
Anak is a historical figure from the conquest of Canaan and a forefather of the Anakites. Anak is the son of the Canaanite, and founder of the city better known as Hebron.
Was moses the leader of the israelites conquest?
No, Moses had died by that time (Deuteronomy ch.34). The conquest of Canaan by the Israelites was led by Joshua (Joshua ch.1).
How many years did it take israelites to reach canaan?
In The Bible, the Israelites wandered for forty years before they entered Canaan.In history, on the other hand, there was no Exodus from Egypt and no militiary conquest of Canaan as described in the Bible. The Israelites did not travel from Egypt to Canaan.
How does the experiences of Abraham and Jacob foreshadow?
Reading the Bible literally, the experiences of Abraham and Jacob foreshadow the conquest of Canaan.
What period follows the Pentateuch?
Immediately following the Pentateuch is the partial conquest of Canaan, as described in the book of Joshua. The period of the Judges follows after this.
What book is named for a military leader who led the israelites into the promise land?
The book of Yehoshua (Joshua), which speaks of the conquest of the land of Canaan by the Jewish people.
Were Canaan and Jericho in the same valley?
Jericho was always part of Canaan, although it was unwalled and unoccupied throughout the Late Bronze Age, when Joshua supposedly brought the walls down. As there was no unified conquest of the Canaanite cities, we have to look for another explanation for the arrival of the Hebrew people.
What is a barbaric?
If someone is barbaric then that means they are cruel or brutal.
What is barbaric sentence?
A barbaric sentence is a punishment or judgment that is cruel, ruthless, or lacking in humanity. It often involves excessive or brutal treatment of individuals, contravening moral or ethical standards.
What is barbaric in Tagalog?
The word "barbaric" in Tagalog is translated as "barbaro" or "barbariko."
In deutronomy where do you find imaginative history?
The imaginative history in Deuteronomy can be found in the retelling of Israel's past with a theological perspective. It includes stories of faithfulness, rebellion, and redemption to teach moral lessons and inspire reverence for God. This type of historical interpretation aims to shape the identity and behavior of the Israelites based on their shared heritage.
