Peter's mother-in-law (4:38-39)
man with a skin disease (5:12-13) paralysed man (5:18-25) man with paralysed arm (6:6-10)
the centurion's servant (7:1-10)
woman with haemorrhage (8:43-48) man with swollen limbs (14:1-4) men with skin diseases (17:11-19)
sight to the blind beggar (18:35-43)
restore ear of the high priest's slave (22:50-51)
widow's son (7:11-15)
Jarius' daughter (8:41-42, 49-56)
man with an evil spirit at the synagogue (4:33-35)
man with demons at Gadara (8:27-35)
boy with epilepsy and demon (9:38-43)
dumb man with a demon (11:14)
crippled woman with an evil spirit (13:11-13)
huge catch of fish (5:1-11)
stilling the storm (8:22-25)
feeding the 5000 (9:12-17)
It is undisputed that Paul was not an eyewitness to the miracles that are recorded in the four gospels. Christian tradition hold that the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark and John were written by disciples of that name, who were eyewitnesses to some of the miracles that they reported. Since Christian tradition hold that Luke's Gospel was written by a young companion of Paul, then the author of this gospel was clearly not an eyewitness of the miracles. Matthew's Gospel was written in Greek and clearly used Mark's Gospel as its main source for the life of Jesus, as did Luke's Gospel. This can be shown because whenever Matthew and Luke agree with Mark, the Greek words are almost identical, something that could not have occurred if Matthew was relying on personal memory. Whenever Matthew and Luke agree on sayings of Jesus, that are not in Mark's Gospel, they use identical words for the sayings, but place them in different contexts and even different times of the ministry of Jesus. Scholars say they must have used as their sources a common document of sayings attributed to Jesus, a document now known as the Q Document, and created plausible contexts in which Jesus could have spoken those sayings. The fact that Matthew, as well as Luke, relied so heavily on Mark and the Q Document means that this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. John's Gospel was also written in Greek and shows evidence of borrowing much of its material from Luke's Gospel. Once again, this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. Only the author of Mark's Gospel could have been an eye-witness to the miracles, but much evidence internal to this gospel indicates that he was really writing a second-hand account. In summary, none of these authors was an eye-witness to the miracles.
The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles were written by Luke in the King James Version of the Bible.
John's Gospel records seven miracles, which is less than in the synoptic Gospels.
The Gospel of John comes after the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament.
No, the Gospel of Luke is not written from Mary's perspective. We can determine that Luke likely interviewed Mary when he was working on his book, because there are things the Luke includes in his Gospel that none of the other Gospel writers include. There are things that only Mary would have known and so the fact they are in Gospel of Luke, he had to have talked to Mary to learn them.
All four Gospels contain miracles performed by Jesus.
There were 45 miracles of Jesus recorded in the Bible, of which 29 are recorded in Mathew's Gospel; 24 in Mark's Gospel; 23 in Luke's and 10 in John's. So you may say that the 3 Gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke emphasised Christ's miracles. By the way he did many more which are nor recorded, as John writes in his Gospel: " And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen."
It is undisputed that Paul was not an eyewitness to the miracles that are recorded in the four gospels. Christian tradition hold that the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark and John were written by disciples of that name, who were eyewitnesses to some of the miracles that they reported. Since Christian tradition hold that Luke's Gospel was written by a young companion of Paul, then the author of this gospel was clearly not an eyewitness of the miracles. Matthew's Gospel was written in Greek and clearly used Mark's Gospel as its main source for the life of Jesus, as did Luke's Gospel. This can be shown because whenever Matthew and Luke agree with Mark, the Greek words are almost identical, something that could not have occurred if Matthew was relying on personal memory. Whenever Matthew and Luke agree on sayings of Jesus, that are not in Mark's Gospel, they use identical words for the sayings, but place them in different contexts and even different times of the ministry of Jesus. Scholars say they must have used as their sources a common document of sayings attributed to Jesus, a document now known as the Q Document, and created plausible contexts in which Jesus could have spoken those sayings. The fact that Matthew, as well as Luke, relied so heavily on Mark and the Q Document means that this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. John's Gospel was also written in Greek and shows evidence of borrowing much of its material from Luke's Gospel. Once again, this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. Only the author of Mark's Gospel could have been an eye-witness to the miracles, but much evidence internal to this gospel indicates that he was really writing a second-hand account. In summary, none of these authors was an eye-witness to the miracles.
Jesus performed 19 miracles in Luke.
There are 1151 verses in the Gospel of Luke.
Luke's gospel begins with Zechariah
There are 1151 verses in the Gospel of Luke.
He was a doctor.
There are only 24 chapters in the Gospel of Luke
book of luke
They are the Gospel of Matthew,Gospel of Mark,Gospel of Luke,and the Gospel of John.
Gospel of Luke 11:31 and 12:27