secularization
Lebanon had a 15-year civil war from 1975 to 1990, fueled by religious and political differences among its diverse population.
In a Muslim state, the civil and religious ruler is typically separate. The civil ruler is responsible for governance and administration, while the religious ruler, such as a Caliph or an Imam, is responsible for spiritual guidance and upholding Islamic teachings. Their roles may overlap in some cases, but they generally serve distinct functions in a Muslim state.
ww1 ww2 the 1st crusade the 2nd crusade all other crusades hebrews vs Egyptians al qaeda Salem witch trials 30 year war Taiping Rebellion Indian wars The Troubles in Ireland Rwanda 1994 Boznia-Herzegovina (and by extension Kosovo) The Ivory Coast civil wars Cyprus East Timor civil war Sri Lankan civil war Current Iraqi civil war Hezbollah vs. Israel Syria vs. Israel Kashmir civil war Chechnya civil war Sudan
They can. In most Islamic Republics, the law of the land is the Koran, and so there would rarely be any conflict between religious belief and the law. In other places there may be some conflict, but these conflicts should be workable. For example in the US people are free to practice religion and to observe any laws connected with religion as long as they do not violate the civil law in the process. Many practice the Jewish dietary laws and no one is going to suggest that there is any problem with the civil law. Catholics must receive communion at least once a year in order to remain Catholics, and civil authorities are not going to prevent someone from obeying that law. If a religious law required that someone be severely beaten, or kept prisoner in his/her own home, then the civil law would have to step in. In the US, everyone's right to practice religion freely is protected by the fact that there is one law, the civil law that comes from the People's adherence to the Constitution. While there may be some examples where the Constitution and local law would trump religious law, it is all part of the greater good and the greatest protection of everyone's basic rights.
The Quakers, also known as the Society of Friends, opposed religious and civil authority as well as military service. They promoted peaceful values, emphasizing principles such as nonviolence, equality, and simplicity in their beliefs and practices.
The question of who would control the Indians
No, in his short time a pharaoh he was too young to have any effective control, which was effectively exercised by a clique of civil and religious aristocrats.
There are two parts to the marriage, the civil (legal side) and the religious side. The complete marriage (civil and religious) can be undertaken by a minister or it is also possible to have a civil marriage ceremony then go to church for a religious blessing of the union to satisfy the religious aspect.
Yes
Selina :)
Yes, ethnic and religious differences have been the cause of most civil wars in Africa.
the beginnig of protestant
Religious differences.
The Quakers
Civil and religious
In political theory the distinction is between civil society and the presumed, earlier state of nature.A civil society is a society in which people are involved in social and political interactions free of state control or regulation. Community groups, voluntary associations and even religious groups, as well as access to mass media and the Internet are important parts of a civil society.What relation is civilized to the word civil?
A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.