Moral Systems
The government cannot sponsor or promote specific religious practices in schools, coerce students to participate in religious activities, or show preference for one religion over others. Additionally, public schools cannot teach religious doctrine as objective truth or require students to pray in a particular manner.
Because a lot of the time, religion and science don't add up. For example, people say ''What were Adam and Eve doing at the time of the dinosaurs?''In that sense, religion and science don't work together, so you have to choose which you believe more.Answer:As you can see in the above answer, the reason that many people think they have to choose either science or religion is that they think that the two cannot be reconciled. They'd be surprised to learn that some great scientists are religious, and many religious people see no problem with science. I'm not going into detail; opinions vary on the details, but generally stated, many people see no conflict.
No, public funds cannot be appropriated for religious purposes in order to maintain the separation of church and state as outlined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This principle aims to prevent the government from endorsing or promoting specific religions.
Jimmy Page's religious beliefs have not been explicitly shared in public. He has been known to have an interest in mysticism, the occult, and various spiritual practices, which have influenced his music and art. Overall, his beliefs remain private.
Religious experience is good evidence of religious belief. Theologians have sought unsuccessfully, for almost two thousand years, to find a proof of the existence of God. They continued looking because they did not see religious experience alone as the proof they needed.
which statement best describe the limit of science
science cannot answer questions about what people should do
Science is limited in addressing questions that involve subjective experiences, moral values, and existential meaning, such as "What is the purpose of life?" or "Is there an absolute morality?" Additionally, questions about personal beliefs, feelings, and aesthetic judgments are inherently subjective and cannot be empirically tested. Science can inform these topics but cannot provide definitive answers.
Science is the application of strict procedures to quantify (observe and measure) all manner of events such as physical forces, human behavior, chemical reactions and biological processes. Hence, science is unable to answer questions where the subject matter cannot be quantified - but even those questions are eventually answered as methods are invented to observe and measure the subject matter.In its short history, science was once unable to answer questions such as: "what is the wind?" - thought to be the breath of gods until the measurement of matter was developed.So, although science cannot yet answer many lingering questions about ourselves and our world, it is only because we have yet to invent a way of observing the subject matter - and not because certain questions are "unanswerable" or "unknowable".
Philosophy revolves around hypothetical questions that cannot be answered through observation. Science revolves around theoretical questions that can and have to be proven through experimentation to be valid.
An idea: much of science is founded on theories which are observed in everyday life, but cannot be proved. For example, science cannot physically prove that any two bodies with finite mass will be attracted by gravity. Theories and laws describe phenomena that cannot be proven.
Science can answer questions about our physical world.
The term that defines questions in science that cannot be addressed using the scientific method is "pseudo-science." These questions often pertain to areas that are not empirically testable or lack measurable evidence, such as metaphysical inquiries or philosophical debates. Pseudo-science may also refer to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but do not adhere to rigorous scientific standards.
Science cannot provide answers to questions that are philosophical, ethical, or subjective in nature. These types of questions often involve personal beliefs, values, or opinions that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry.
An idea: much of science is founded on theories which are observed in everyday life, but cannot be proved. For example, science cannot physically prove that any two bodies with finite mass will be attracted by gravity. Theories and laws describe phenomena that cannot be proven.
Science can only answer questions about the natural world and how it works. Questions about philosophy, ethics, religion or the supernatural do not lend themselves to empirical analysis.
Unfalsifiable questions. What this means is that if a question cannot be proven wrong by any means, then science cannot provide any answers about it.