In Mark 5:9, Jesus asked the demon his name, and the demon answered, "Legion." However, there could be another meaning to this story, in which case we can not say that the demon was really called Legion.
Dennis R MacDonald (The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark) argues that the Gospel of Mark contains material modelled on the Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, using a technique known as mimesis, common at the time among Greek students to demonstrate mastery of the Greek language. He notes that when Jesus and his crew disembarked they met a wild, demon-possessed man of incredible strength and violent, terrifying habits, who lived among caves. In The Odyssey, Odysseus and his crew disembarked and met Polyphemus, a savage, lawless, cave-dwelling giant of incredible strength and violent, terrifying habits. When Polyphemus asked Odysseus for his name, he replied, 'Nobody'. When Jesus asked the demon his name, the demon replied, 'Legion' - the request was reversed and the answer was an absolute reverse of that by Odysseus. There are so many other parallels in this short passage that the demon's reply to Jesus was undoubtedly a transvaluation of the reply in the Odyssey, not really the demon's name.
The name of the demon was Legion. Jesus cast Legion out of the man and allowed the demons to enter a herd of pigs before they drowned themselves in the sea.
No, there is no mention in the Bible of Jesus compensating the owner of the pigs in this particular miracle. The focus is on the demon-possessed man being freed from his affliction rather than the material loss of the pigs.
In the Bible story, the demons possessing the man begged Jesus not to send them into the abyss, so He allowed them to enter a nearby herd of pigs instead. The pigs then drowned in the sea. The demons themselves were not destroyed, but the pigs they possessed met their end.
In the Bible, the sycamore tree is mentioned in the story of Zacchaeus, a tax collector who climbed a sycamore tree to see Jesus passing by. This tree symbolizes Zacchaeus' eagerness to see Jesus and his willingness to overcome obstacles in order to meet Him. It also represents a turning point in Zacchaeus' life, as he ended up repenting and following Jesus after their encounter.
Saint Patrick is said to have tended pigs and sheep on Slemish Mountain in County Antrim, Northern Ireland during his captivity as a slave.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the Seleucid king, defiled the Jewish temple in 167 BCE by slaughtering pigs on the altar, outlawing Jewish practices, and erecting an altar to Zeus inside the temple. This led to the Maccabean Revolt by the Jewish rebels against the Seleucid rule.
No, there is no mention in the Bible of Jesus compensating the owner of the pigs in this particular miracle. The focus is on the demon-possessed man being freed from his affliction rather than the material loss of the pigs.
no it is Matthew hiles you bender you sleep with pigs
The demons was driven from a man and the demons ask to be allowed to go into the swine instead of where they came from which would of been some sort of hell. Jesus let them go into the swine. the swine killed themselves other than be possessed. So, in other words, Jesus did not actually drive the herd of pigs over the cliff. The words in the KJV 'He suffered them' describe His permission, or that He allowed them to go there, not that He thought to destroy the pigs. The subsequent events only serve to demonstrate the natural intent of Satan and his followers 'to steal and to kill and to destroy.' The responsibility for the destruction of the herd rests solely with the demons.
pigs
Pigs
pigs eat just about anything they will eat a dead pig if it is not removed from the pen
In the Bible story, the demons possessing the man begged Jesus not to send them into the abyss, so He allowed them to enter a nearby herd of pigs instead. The pigs then drowned in the sea. The demons themselves were not destroyed, but the pigs they possessed met their end.
pigs got their name by their fatness!!
because their pigs drowned
Pigs
guinea pigs dont need to be removed from thier parents they will not be harmed by them.
yes. as long as the seeds are removed.