John 20:30-31 30And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: 31 But these are written, that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you might have life through his name.
John wrote to give a theological presentation of whom Christ was and why He came. His purpose was evangelistic in nature. Christ's role as Lord and Messiah is emphasised, and encapsulated in the seven great "I Am" statements. John also wanted to teach the role of the Trinity in salvation. Answer John states his reason for writing his gospel: John 20:30, 31 - And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. [NKJV]
Another Answer
Some say that the apostle John wrote the Gospel to correct serious errors in the other New Testament gospels.
However, it would be surprising that John waited so long to correct the record. Moreover, the early Church Father, Origen, did not believe that John's Gospel was a more true record, saying (Commentary on John), "although he does not always tell the truth literally, he always tells it spiritually."
Further, some scholars say that John's Gospel drew from Luke's Gospel, meaning that it could not have been written by an eyewitness to the events it describes. John's Gospel was originally anonymous, and John was first mentioned in the known record as the author, late in the second century. Others say that John's Gospel was written in response to a debate about who Jesus was.
A:
First we need to establish whether St. John the apostle really wrote the gospel that now bears his name, as this may help in determining where the gospel was written. The Gospel of John was originally anonymous until the Church Fathers decided in the second century that its 'disciple whon Jesus loved' must be John, since that name is not mentioned in this gospel. They then decided that the beloved disciple was also the author and that it was out of modesty that he did not tell us his name, thus arriving at the decision that the gospel now known as John's Gospel was written by John. However, modern scholars say that this gospel could not have been written by an eyewitness to the events portrayed, which thus means that John was certainly not the author.
Based on an analysis of the three epistles that appear to have been written by the same author and are therefore known as the Epistles of John, scholars have determined that the gospel was written in a Christian community, which for convenience is now known as the Johannine community. The location of this community remains unknown, but may well have been in or around Syria.
The Book of John, also known as the Gospel of John, was written by an anonymous author some time early in the second century CE. The author appears to have represented the views of a faction in a broader community now called the "Johannine Community". The location of this community is unclear, but some scholars believe it may have been in Syria or Asia Minor.
Answer
John the Apostle is thought to have written the Gospel of John in Ephesus where he is known to have lived and worked.
Answer
No one knows for sure. Some scholars believe it could have been written on a Greek island. Others believe it was written somewhere in Syria. Still others propose various regions in what is now modern day Turkey, possibly in Ephesus.
However, New Testament scholars say that John's gospel could not have been written by an eyewitness to the events described in the gospel, which means that the second-century guess as to its authorship was just that - a guess, even if an inspired one. Without knowing who wrote the gospel attributed to John, we can not really say how old he was.
The Gospel of John was originally anonymous and the Church Fathers only attributed it to the disciple John later in the second century. At one stage it was said that Cerinthus, the founder of a gnostic school, had written it, so the attribution to John must have been quite late in the second century. There is good evidence that this gospel was inspired by Luke's Gospel, and it is generally considered to have been written sometime in the first two decades of the second century. The Gospel was apparently written in a closed community, possibly a mildly Gnostic one, and this community is now known as the Johannine Community because of the Gospel's name. However, there is uncertainty as to where the community was located.
The Gospel According to John differs in some important respects from the other, synoptic gospels, although Luke's Gospel seems to have been his primary source. The author appears to have been concerned about the development of cults around some of Jesus' apostles.
Elaine Pagels believes that the author we now know as John was attempting to counteract the influence of St Thomas' Gospel. It was John who created the image of "doubting Thomas" and exposed many weaknesses in the apostle. John's Gospel also frequently has the 'disciple whom Jesus loved' surpass Peter, as if wishing to undermine Peter. The Gospel shows that John was opposed to Gnostic concepts such as docetism.
Traditionally, the Gospel of John is believed to have been written by the apostle John while in Ephesus, around 90-100 AD.
No. According to many, the Gospel of John was written by the Apostle John.
Luke is the longest gospel.
The short answer is that John does not mention himself by name in the Gospel of John because John did not write that Gospel. It was written anonymously and only attributed to John by the Church Fathers later in the second century, when they were attempting to decide who probably wrote each of the New Testament gospels. A slightly fuller anwer is that the Church Fathers, puzzled at the lack of evidence as to who wrote this Gospel, saw that a 'disciple whom Jesus loved' was a key character in this Gospel. They decided that this disciple must be the author, who must have just been too modest to use his own name. They then noted that the apostle John was not mentioned any where in this Gospel, and decided that John was the missing disciple. Thus, on supposition and quite limited evidence, John became the author of the fourth gospel.
13, I think...Another thought:Paul wrote 14 letters (books of the Bible), but I believe John only wrote 5 :The gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John and Revelation.
The Gospel of John comes after the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament.
These were two different Johns, attributed to two different books.
No. According to many, the Gospel of John was written by the Apostle John.
Johns Varghese has written: 'The imagery of love in the Gospel of John' -- subject(s): Bible, Commentaries, Love, Biblical teaching
John was the most beloved disciple. Like the rest of the disciples, he was commissioned to preach the gospel and to heal the sick. John also received the revelation of the end days.
The gospel of JOHN 1 John, 2 John, 3 John Revelation
John Johns was born in 1796-07.
John--the beloved disciple--had a tough life after Jesus. He was captured by the Romans and sent to the Island of Patmos.
John the Baptist is not credited with writing any gospel.
The first four Books in the New Testament, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are Gospels and each tell the story of Jesus' ministry on earth in four slightly different slants, which is understandable as they were written by four different men, but all were lead by the Holy Spirit so that we get a more complete story of Jesus. John did write I, II, and III John and the Book of Revelation, but these four books are not the "gospel", only the first four books in the N.T. are the Gospel accounts.
No. John the Baptist did not write any books in the New Testament.
Actually all 12 were there.
John Johns died on 1876-04-04.