Because the topic could make the people involved in the discussion tense or angry. People hold matters of faith very dearly, and any perceived attack on those beliefs will be perceived as a personal attack.
Discussions about religion can be controversial because beliefs are deeply personal and tied to identity, community, and culture. Differences in beliefs can lead to misunderstandings, conflict, and judgments. Additionally, religion often influences societal norms and values, making discussions about it sensitive and potentially offensive to some.
Islam is considered to be the first religion in the Philippines, introduced by Arab traders and missionaries in the 14th century.
Freedom of religion can be controversial because it involves balancing the right to practice one's beliefs against potential conflicts with laws, rights of others, or societal norms. Differences in beliefs and practices can lead to tension and clashes when individuals or groups feel their freedoms are being restricted or when beliefs are perceived as harmful or discriminatory. Additionally, geopolitical factors, historical conflicts, and power struggles can also contribute to the controversy surrounding freedom of religion.
There is no set number of followers required for a belief system to be considered a religion. A religion is typically defined by its beliefs, practices, rituals, and cultural aspects rather than the number of followers it has. The significance and influence of a religion are not solely determined by its size.
Yes, the Quaker religion is considered a Christian religion. Quakers believe in the core principles of Christianity, such as the belief in Jesus Christ as their savior and the importance of living a life in accordance with Christian values.
The Vedas are a collection of ancient sacred texts in Hinduism. They are considered the oldest scriptures of Hinduism and are highly revered as divine revelations.
It seems that anything that isn't considered a 'main stream' religion is thought to be controversial.
be
participating in controversial discussions that have nothing to do with the business of the workplace.
The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.The rulers of Rome would ban a religion if they considered the religion to promote treason or if they considered the religion to be decadent.
Yes
The blunt language used in the narrative, and the open discussions of sex and virginity.
The violence i guess
Hiram Elfenbein has written: 'Organized religion' -- subject(s): Controversial literature, Religion
It is considered a religion, yes.
Many religions have a missionary imperative, which is to say, they ask their members to go out and convert everyone from other religions. Many people find conversations about religion with missionaries very awkward because, in part, the missionary isn't so much interested in your religion as they are in changing it -- this can lead to very one-sided conversations.
Generally in a democratic society with divided opinions and loyalties discussions about politics are not considered controversial, and are, if you were to observe an election or just watch the news, quite common. If a town, city or region has a particular loyalty, it might be seen as 'taboo' to talk about politics very often. In a one-party dictatorship or a state with political repression like Syria, Iran, Russia, North Korea or Saudi Arabia discussion of politics would be seen as more controversial.
He was good guy.