In the New Testament Gospel of Matthew 5:3-10, the beatitudes are eight (8) two-part (or two-phrase) teachings from Christ's "Sermon on the Mount." The first part or phrase of each of the eight teachings states whom Jesus said should be considered "Blessed" (pronounced, intentionally, in this case, as a two syllable word, with emphasis on the first syllable "bless," followed by pronouncing "ed," as in what's short for the name "Edward," as its own less-emphasized syllable); and the second part/phrase of each teaching states, in effect, why.
Each of the groups of persons in each of the first parts/phrases of each teaching are those generally considered to be unfortunate or downtrodden in life; and each of the second parts/phrases' reasons why are generally humble ones which focus on love and humility, rather than force and exaction such as found in similar teachings in the Old Testament. In Matthew 5:3-10 we find...
Blessed are:
...and then, in Matthew 5:11-12 is found, in effect, Christ's follow-up commentary, which some say echos the Old Testament's Isaiah 51:7. In fact, nearly all of the beatitudes may be mapped back to various Old Testament verse and teachings; however, Christ's presentation of them they way he did in the Sermon on the Mount is generally interpreted as his intentionally elevating familiar Old Testament teachings to, in effect, entirely new teachings of greater import, as he stated them, which epitomize the highest of Christ's ideals regarding spirituality and compassion.
In the New Testament Gospel of Luke, in what it calls Christ's "Sermon on the Plain," the beatitudes are stated differently. In Luke 6:20-22, Christ says "[b]lessed are you..." and then he lists four two-part/phrase teachings in a positive manner, as counsel or guidance, similar to what's in Matthew...
Blessed are you:
...but then, in Luke 6:24-26, he flips the perspective for the second four teachings to the more negatively admonishing "[w]oe unto you" form...
Woe unto you:
Incidentally, and to be clear, said woes should not be confused with the "Woes of the Pharisees," as found, later, in Luke 11:37-54.
Though I, for one, tend to prefer the Gospel of Matthew over that of Luke, just generally, it's very important for one to carefully examine both books' conveyance of the beatitudes; to compare, contrast and then fully understand and interpret how the two different means of presentation manifestly affect intended meaning....
...in much the same manner, and for much the same kinds of reasons, as one need fully grasp and appreciate the important difference between stating the Golden Rule as admonition in the negative form (similar to as found in Tobit 4:15), as that one should not treat others as one would not like to be treated...
...versus the positive counsel or guidance form (similar to as found in Luke 6:31) that we should all do unto others as we would have them do unto us.
In Christ's follow-up to his Golden-Rule-themed explanation of the Great Commandment, in Luke 10:25-28, and his attempt to then define who is one's neighbor as referenced therein, he tells, in Luke 10:29-37, the famous Parable of the Good Samaritanin which Christ, as well explained by George Foot Moore, in his 19th century classic Judaism in the First Three Centuries of the Christian Era, intentionally "goes beyond the negative formulation of not doing what one would not like done to themselves; to the positive formulation of actively doing good to another that, if the situations were reversed, one would desire that the other would do for them. This formulation, as indicated in the parable of the Good Samaritan, emphasises the needs for positive action that brings benefit to another, not simply restraining oneself from negative activities that hurt another."
There is, then, no small amount of meaningful difference between stating the Golden Rule as a mere restraint which passively prevents harm, verses stating it as a positive action which actively promotes good. Christ's repeating theme, throughout his teachings, was one of action, not restraint; and so that, in part, is why I prefer Matthew's presentation of the beatitudes over Luke's. That said, neither the beatitudes, nor the Golden Rule, may be fully contextualized and deeply understood and properly practiced without fully grasping the both negative restraint and woes, as well as the positive actions.
Discipleship, at its core, refers to the act (note that word) of following Christ -- becoming, with intention, his disciple -- by learning what he taught, and then actually doing it in one's life... again: action in the form of doing, and not mere restraint.
Along with the only two commandments Christ ever gave -- to love God, and to love neighbor as self -- as found in Matthew 22:34-40, "on which (commandments, he said) depend all the law and the prohphets," it's difficult to find anything which more succinctly summarizes Christ's teachings with regard to mercy, spirituality and compassion (and, indirectly, works, too, when they're expressed in the positive as actions, and not in the negative as restraint or woe) than the beatitudes and the Golden Rule.
If those are key things that Christ wanted us to emulate, then it is impossible to become Christ's disciple without understanding them. The beatitudes, then, are requirements, indeed, of discipleship.
The Sermon on the Mount is sometimes referred to as the Beatitudes, as it begins with a series of blessings known as the Beatitudes.
Discipleship is the practice by which someone is followed and their doctrine is spread. Assuming you are asking this in a biblical context, discipleship is the practice of following Jesus, and thus encouraging others to follow him as well. It is the way by which his teachings and his doctrine are spread to the world. More specifically, being a disciple is about holding to Jesus' teachings, and falls synonymous to the word 'discipline'. Christians were first called Christians because the disciples were like Christ.
The Beatitudes are found in the New Testament book of Matthew, chapter 5 beginning with verse 3. The book was written by Matthew and the beatitudes were given to us by Jesus. He taught them to His disciples as they gathered on the side of a mountain. Jesus taught them this after seeing the multitude of people that had been following Him.
Oh honey, Saint Patrick was all about those beatitudes. He was preaching, teaching, and living those blessed attitudes like a pro. So yeah, he definitely followed them like they were going out of style.
Most New Testament scholars believe that Matthew's Gospel, which contains the eight beatitudes, was written in the 80s of the first century. They believe that Luke's Gospel, which contains four of the beatitudes in a slightly different form, was written around the turn of the century.The four beatitudes more or less common to both Matthewand Luke are understood to have been copied from the hypothetical 'Q' document, which was written around the middle of the first century.
The Cost of Discipleship was created in 1937.
paper on Discipleship Counseling
Church of the Beatitudes was created in 1938.
Community of the Beatitudes was created in 1973.
All of them demonstrated one or more of the beatitudes.
Pier Giorgio Frassati - Man of the Beatitudes
The Sermon on the Mount is sometimes referred to as the Beatitudes, as it begins with a series of blessings known as the Beatitudes.
Humility
The Beastly Beatitudes of Balthazar B was created in 1968.
The Beatitudes may be used as an outline of Christian living.
The mount of the Beatitudes is a hill. When did God make the hill? When the rest of the earth was made.
The Beatitudes are located in the Gospel of Matthew, specifically in Matthew 5:3-12.