answersLogoWhite

0

To some extent, the answer depends on what you mean by a "crime."

Israel was under the control of the Roman Empire in Peter's day, so the Jews were subject to both Roman civil law and Jewish religious law, and a given action might be "criminal" to one, but not the other. With than in mind, Peter committed at least one act that would have been criminal in Rome's eyes, and he regularly defied the Jewish religious leaders.

When the mob came to arrest Jesus, Peter "assaulted a man with a deadly weapon" (to put it in contemporary terms), cutting off Malchus' ear with his sword (John 18:20). Rome would have considered this a crime, but the mob was composed only of Jews, and Jesus healed Malchus. Since the damage was undone, the incident might as well have never happened from any legal standpoint.

Peter also "broke out" of prison (an angel released him - Acts 5:19 and 12:7, 8), and he refused to stop preaching Jesus despite being commanded to "cease and desist" (Acts 5:40-42).

These latter offenses were solely against the Jews, and the charges against Peter and the apostles were brought more from fear and envy than law (like the charges against Jesus - Mark 15:10). It would be something of a stretch to think of these offenses as "crimes." The justification for the behavior of Peter and the rest of the apostles toward the Jewish religious leaders was simple: We ought to obey God rather than men. (Acts 5:29).

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?