it will be more willing to buy because we will have more money
when they are for sale.
producers would supply less than consumers would be willing to consume at that particular price. There would be SHORTAGE
for items that are plugged in you would use less of our natural resources to make energy but for items that run on batteries you would use less of the natural resources to make them
No, it's significantly less toxic than botulism.
Urea is approximately 1.5 times less toxic than ammonia. This is because urea is less alkaline compared to ammonia, which can cause burns and irritation. However, both substances can be toxic if ingested in large amounts.
Urea is the less toxic in nature among the nitrogenous wastes where as Ammonia is 100,000 times toxic than urea.
A larger LD indicates a less toxic substance, because it takes more of the substance to kill.
less damage to the ozone
Yes. First, any of the gases found in flatulence - with the exception of oxygen - would be regarded as "toxic" if you had to exclusively breathe them. Such as hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. It would not be so much that those gases are toxic, but that you were receiving toxic amounts. Secondly, methane is toxic, and less then levels of 100% could harm you. Thirdly, the amounts likely to be expelled during flatulence, are not going to poison anyone.
Ammonia is approximately 3 times more toxic than urea in terms of acute toxicity. Urea is less toxic to aquatic organisms compared to ammonia because it undergoes nitrification in water, converting it to nitrate which is less toxic.
A catalytic converted convers the toxic chemicals into less toxic chemicals. It is crucial so that the byproducts of combustion are less harmful to the environment and to the car itself.