The origin of Freemasonry, like that of so many things, is clouded in history. Although a great many books have been written about the various theories, and myths, we can't say with certainty what the real story is. Most Masonic scholars believe that the current fraternity of Freemasonry ("speculative masons") simply evolved from the guilds and "Lodges" of the stone masons ("operative masons") in medieval Europe -- particularly in Great Britain. We have records indicating there were "operative lodges" in the early 1600s, but the non-working masons don't start to form lodges until about the end of that century. The formation of the Grand Lodge of England, on June 24, 1717, is considered to be the formalized starting point of the worldwide organization that is known as Freemasonry today. Refer to the related links below for more information.
With regard to the original answer posted here, Freemasonry is not a religion, although it is religious in nature, and requires each member to profess a belief in a supreme being. Masons come from many faiths, and sometimes refer to themselves as a "Brotherhood of men under the Fatherhood of God."
No, he is not a Freemason.
No she is not a Freemason.
Paul McCartney is a Freemason.
No, Stalin was not a Freemason.
No, he is not a Freemason.
is sarkodie a freemason
Arafat was not a Freemason.
yes wills carrier is a freemason he is even the freemason leader
Unless a person states they are a Freemason, it is difficult to know for sure if they are or are not. I do not think he is a Freemason.
If you are asking who founded the institution, the answer is that its origin is shrouded in the mists of time and nobody knows how it got started. It is unlikely to have been founded by a single individual.
He isn't a Freemason.
Kari Hilson is not a Freemason.