well, in my opinion, peoples isn't actually a word. if there is more than one person, then you'd say people. i guess that you could say it when you're talking to friends, but don't use it in front of English teacher who will correct you. i reackon that it's just a matter of opinion.
People is the plural of person. "The American people..." "The people of New Guinea"... etc. If you're talking about a place that has several different groups of people, you could use peoples, i.e. "The peoples of Europe" could mean "The people of France, the people of Germany, the people of Italy,..."
When you are talking about government, you can use the term "peoples" as in: It is the people's money that built these roads.
You can use these products, it does not matter if they say there just for black people.
For food, or for feathers, which native peoples use as decoration.
what tools did the aboriginal people use to build their homes
The ojibve peoples were involved in the fur trade.
AnswerWell, people and peoples are correct, but wannabe G's = want to be gangsters say: peoples.
The plural form of person is people, so you should use that word. If the people possess something, then you use people's.
more than 10 peoples
The correct use of the apostrophe in "people's lives" indicates possession, meaning the lives belonging to people. "Peoples' lives" would imply the lives of multiple distinct groups (or nations) of people, which is less common. Therefore, "people's lives" is typically the appropriate choice in most contexts.
No, there is no longer a need for hunting them. The only peoples who should have a limited harvest are the Arctic's native peoples, who use them for food as a part of their culture.
It is their people's willingness to vote that makes the country such a successful democracy. In India, the people's favourite sport is cricket. It is in the people's interest that the library should remain.
name four things that people use rocks to create