answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How were kinship and clan membership important to the structure of Native American societies?

Im male AND female


How were kinship and clan membership important to structure of Native American societies?

Im male AND female


One modern-day social structure that had its origin in the neolithic era is?

Agricultural societies are a modern-day social structure that originated in the Neolithic era. The transition from hunting and gathering to settled agriculture marked a shift in social organization, with the development of permanent settlements, division of labor, and social hierarchies. These structures laid the foundation for many aspects of contemporary societies.


What is the importance of the Magic: The Gathering turn structure chart in understanding the gameplay mechanics of the game?

The Magic: The Gathering turn structure chart is important because it outlines the sequence of actions players can take during their turns, helping them understand the game's mechanics and strategize effectively.


Are the Cahokia's patriarchal?

The exact social structure of Cahokia is still debated among historians and archeologists, but it is believed that it was a hierarchical society with male leaders. However, women also held important roles within the community, indicating a more complex social structure than just patriarchy.


What were the characteristics of the hunter gatherer society?

Hunter-gatherer societies were relatively small communities and typically nomadic, hunting and gathering at and from known feeding grounds during certain seasons, and moving on to new grounds at an appropriate time. They never took more than they needed at any given time. These societies also had extensive knowledge of the fauna (animals) and flora (plants) unique to particular areas. They developed basic tools to help them hunt and gather, and to utilise their resources. There is usually also a division of labour between the sexes in such societies, with the males doing most of the hunting and the females doing most of the gathering.


What Four characteristics of hunter-gatherer societies?

Nomadic lifestyle, moving based on the availability of resources. Dependence on foraging, hunting, and gathering for food. Egalitarian social structure with minimal hierarchy. Small, close-knit communities with strong kinship ties.


What were the main differences between hunter-gatherer societies and those based primarily on agriculture?

Hunter-gatherer societies were nomadic, relying on hunting and gathering for food, while agricultural societies settled in one place to cultivate crops and raise animals. Hunter-gatherers had a more egalitarian social structure compared to the hierarchical societies that developed with agriculture. Agriculture allowed for larger populations, more complex division of labor, and the accumulation of surplus resources.


What are characteristics of a hunter gatherer?

Hunter-gatherers are nomadic or semi-nomadic societies that rely on hunting wild animals, fishing, and gathering wild plants for sustenance. They typically live in small, egalitarian groups and have a deep connection to their environment, relying on detailed knowledge of the land for survival. Social structure is often based on kinship ties, with gender roles that are more fluid compared to agricultural societies.


How did native peoples structure their societies?

How Native American societies were structured depended on the tribe. However, most of them had chiefs, a council, and a system of oral laws.


What is the mla citation for a gathering of old men by ernest gaines?

To cite "A Gathering of Old Men" by Ernest Gaines in MLA format, the general citation structure is: Gaines, Ernest J. A Gathering of Old Men. Vintage Books, 1992.


What was life like for hunter gatherer?

Hunter-gatherer societies lived in small groups, usually nomadic, and relied on hunting animals and gathering wild plants for their food. They had a deep connection to the natural world and lived in harmony with their environment. Their social structure was typically egalitarian, with no formal leaders or hierarchies.