You are wrong. Chickens do exhibit homosexual behavior.
Furthermore, we do not define human nature by comparing it to what is natural for other species.
Being homosexual is considered natural because sexual orientation is a part of someone's identity that is determined by a complex interplay of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Just as being heterosexual is natural for some individuals, being homosexual is an inherent aspect of many people's lives. LGBTQ+ individuals have been documented throughout history and across cultures, underscoring the natural diversity of human sexuality.
Being Homosexual - 1984 TV was released on: USA: 1 May 1984
There is nothing wrong with BEING homosexual, but you must not DO any homosexual act.
No, not all chickens are female. Chickens can be male or female, with females being called hens and males being called roosters.
It is the fear of homosexuals or being/becoming homosexual. If you have access to the DSM IV, its in there. It is the fear of homosexuals and/or being/becoming homosexual. If you have access to the DSM IV, its in there.
By being a homosexual!
Being a homosexual.
To be pushed into being a homosexual, or encouraged.
the romans believed that being homosexual was the answer to there prayers.
Chickens are social animals and thrive in the company of their flock. Keeping just one chicken can lead to loneliness and stress, as they naturally seek companionship. Therefore, it's recommended to have at least two chickens to ensure their well-being and happiness. Additionally, having multiple chickens allows for natural social interactions and behaviors.
I've tried very hard not to phrase this in a way that can't be misinterpreted by someone with a bias and/or an axe to grind on either side of the controversy: There is no natural relationship between being a judge and being homosexual.
Both are chickens.They both have feathers.