If a person could eliminate crime or pollution, they should choose pollution. Pollution in the air can affect the lungs and may cause people to get sick and die.
Land pollution could be fixed, at least to a degree, if people worked together to stop the pollution. It is doubtful that pollution would ever be eliminated totally because a lot of pollution to the land is from chemicals that are used in agriculture. It is highly unlikely that those chemicals will ever stop being used.
Yes, it could. Here's the explanation straight from Study Island.Point source pollution occurs when harmful substances are added directly to a body of water. Non-point source pollution occurs when harmful substances enter water indirectly through the environment. Illegal dumping(unsafe disposal of pollutants) can be either a point or non-point source of pollution.
The voter could not decide which candidate to eliminate.
As a play on words you could use "Pollution is Rubbish".
What could Mrs.Granger have done to eliminate the use of the new word
You could multiply the first equation by 3 and the second by -5 and eliminate the x... OR you could multiply the first equation by 7 and the second by 10 and eliminate the y. Either way works.
Really it does not matter you could choose either
pollution cannot be completely reduced it is impossible we could definatly reduce pollution but not completely stop it
Pollution.
either choose chimchar as your starter at the beginning, or trade from another game. you could also try the GTS.
It could totally destroy it.
An attractive heading might be Pause Pollution. It could also be Pollution Changes Lives. There are many different headings this could be.