A boycott can be a powerful tool for social change, allowing individuals to express their discontent with companies or policies they find unethical. It can effectively pressure organizations to alter their practices and promote accountability. However, the impact of a boycott largely depends on public awareness and participation; without sufficient support, it may not achieve its intended goals. Ultimately, whether a boycott is considered "good" often depends on the specific context and motivations behind it.
he was the leader and he led the whole thing.
To boycott anything is a good method to protest in a nonviolent way.
The workers ordered a boycott of company goods until their wages were compensated.
it means to refuse to do some thing it is boycott and not boy cott.
A Boycott
A Boycott
No, it is a verb and a noun. Proboycott is an adjective and so is antiboycott. Hope that is what you were looking for.
If you want to stay healthy, then yes.
A boycott is a good way to protest because you are essentially pulling support from that which you are protesting. What had turned into an unfair relationship will buckle/change after it's most important support source is missing.
he stuck up for his religon and did some thing about it
One thing Jim Shockey did is refuse to attend the 1980 Olympics. He refused due to the international boycott against Russia
the consequence was that the stamp act was not very sure about what happened in the boycott so eat my sh........................ it ! sorry guys i dont know this thing? at least i said something