Renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power are generally considered to be the least damaging to the environment compared to fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas. These renewable sources produce lower greenhouse gas emissions and have minimal impact on air and water quality.
i drive a car, so emissions are damaging the environment
Any data confirm damaging of the environment by hydrogen peroxide.
you are damaging the environment by burning coal because it realeses gases into the atmosphere.
It is people.
yes..... renewable is better than non-renewable because you can renew it and it is better for the environment. :)
About the same as renewable resources, except that we cant renew the non renewable resources.
Because it just is :P
The mining and burning of coal is the most damaging to the environment.
Protecting the environment increases production costs and reduces competitiveness.
by using renewable resources we can save the environment. Most of the time non-renewable resources are bad for the environment by destroying the ozone. gas and coal are examples of non-renewable resources. another reason renewable resources are better is because they are well, renewable. that way we can never run out. examples would be hydroelectric, solar, and wind power
They differ because of their effects. Using renewable resources (solar, wind, water, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal, ocean thermal, biomass and biofuel) releases no carbon dioxide emissions (which are causing global warming). Using non-renewable resources, like coal (and other fossil fuels), directly contribute to global warming is seriously damaging our environment.