Judging by the number of species that have been obsesrved participating in homosexual behaviours, nature doesn't seem to particularly mind homosexuality.
Being gay or lesbian has nothing to do with what religion you are part of. Your religion only affects how you express yourself. This is another reason to show the constriction religion has on people, but that is simply an aside.Sikhism does not have any specific teachings against homosexuality. It is not mentioned in the Sikh Holy book, Guru Granth Sahib. However, the temporal leader of Sikhism has condemned homosexuality saying it is the duty of political leaders to vehemently oppose the acceptance of homosexuality and to ensure same-sex marriage is never legalised.
Yes, he was against it.
Of course not, there is no rational argument against homosexuality.
Yes....
Yes It is.
Homosexuals are part of nature. Unless you can prove all homosexual animals are somehow artificial; "homosexuality is not natural" would be an incorrect statement. To say that "homosexuals are part of nature" does not prove that it is natural. I could say Pedophiles are part of nature, and that would not prove that it is natural. To compare animals to humans is also foolish because we are so set apart from them. Homosexuality is not natural because it goes against the human body anatomy. Only the mind is homosexual, the body remains heterosexual.
Homosexuality is observed in many species in nature, but it is not as common as heterosexual behavior. The prevalence of homosexuality varies among different species, with some showing higher rates than others. Overall, homosexuality is a natural and relatively common behavior in the animal kingdom.
You would have to blame nature. It is a natural part of humanity.
Deepak Chopra recognizes that homosexuality is a healthy part of nature. See related links for more information.
homosexuality does not go against the institution of marriage, much in the same way that being color blind does not go against the institution of marriage.homosexuality does not go against the institution of marriage, much in the same way that being color blind does not go against the institution of marriage.
No. He was against homosexuality.
You can't. It's a part of nature. Furthermore, there is no reason to reduce it.