There really aren't impacts on the environment, unless you were to spray the Dry powder outdoors for no reason.
Some were too persistent in the environment so banned for that reason like DDT
the other reason is that people make bags out of them
It leads to increased damage to the environment.
because we only have one planet, sweetie, and it's not like Amazon Prime can deliver a new one in two days. So, if we keep trashing this place like a frat house after a kegger, we're all screwed. Plus, who wants to live in a world where the only wildlife left are cockroaches and pigeons?
because more people there are more trees we need and there is not enough tees!!!!! another reason- a place with a better environment attracts more people to want to live there rather then a place with a bad environment. Another reason would be that if someone had a job related to environment, they would move there for work
its the reason gou yuou to gry a lijgtgl
Humans are not destroying the planet or the environment. It is doubtful they would be able to destroy the planet. It is certain they are having an impact on the present environment which is significantly different to destroying it. Environments are changed. They always have been. The reason why environmentalists strive to preserve the current environment is to keep it in equilibrium so humans can live longer.
Because many drugs are highly addictive; many can hook people after one try. The reason for the increase in trying is the relative ease of obtaining and using them.
Many scientific discoveries were made by people trying to find something other than "God" as a reason for whatever they were investigating.
A:It is hard to find a reason why non-religious people are less likely to care about the environment, particularly in the face of anecdotal evidence that care for the environment is more likely to be strong among non-religious people. While we can all hold biased positions on this, an objective view that non-religious people are less likely to care about the environment requires provable evidence, and there appears to be none.
NO because tourism has made a big impact on the environment due to resort etc. they are just destroying Caribbean paradises by building resorts. That is a no -no and the reason for the Ginnuk movement that is going on. The natives don't want the place to be destroyed and deforested. Trees are important to tribes and native people.