0
Well, it is good because it helps make houses and stuff. But it is bad because it ruins animal's homes and stuff. It is a bit of a weird question.
Yeah well, it depends on which rainforest/area which is being cut down. For example, if you are looking at the brazilean rainforest you need to look at the brazilean government ( who will probably say something like the rainforest covers 40% of our land and is full of resources) and then you have to look at the Indios, an indigenous tribe who will probably say something like we've lived here for centuries and the deforestation is destroying our way of lifeand our traditions. Then you have to think about independent companies (like triple velvet) who use sustainably souoced wood for their products and replace the trees they use. Then there is the money grabbing idiots (you cant call them that though) who will take take take and destroy the forest to get what they need for the money. This will include burning the forest for land, or to get their machines through to dig huge holes to mine. Its not a weird question. the only reason im answering it is because im doing a project on it myself and if i know it, why not share it.
What else can I help you with?
What should you search for and take notes on if you have compelling arguments for both sides of a research question?
When doing research on compelling arguments for both sides of a research question, you should search for and take notes on the arguments for both sides.
Which is not true about opening arguments?
The judge gives the speech is not a true statement about opening arguments. During opening arguments both sides of the case are given by the prosecutor and the defense lawyer.
Can persuasive speech have arguments from both sides?
Yes, a persuasive speech can incorporate arguments from both sides to present a comprehensive view of the topic. By addressing opposing viewpoints, the speaker can build credibility, demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject, and strengthen their own arguments by refuting counterarguments. However, it is important to ultimately take a stance and provide strong reasons for the audience to align with a particular perspective.
How do political debates between politicians help inform citizens about laws?
Citizens can hear arguments from both sides of an issue.
At a bench trial, how do you get sentenced?
At a bench trial, the judge decides the sentence after hearing the evidence and arguments presented by both sides.
How do you use cliche in a sentence?
A cliché is an overused phrase or it can be a stereotype. Both sides in the debate used cliché arguments that were weak.
If you were to choose between beauty or brains what one would you choose please help I'm on cons side i need both sides 2 arguments asap?
I would choose both of them.
does harty potter have anti-christan undertones?
There's a lot of arguments on both sides, but IMO no
How does the author present a balanced view of the penny debate?
The author presents a balanced view of the penny debate by highlighting both the arguments for keeping the penny (such as its symbolic value and benefits to charities) and the arguments for phasing it out (including production costs and practicality issues). By acknowledging and representing both sides of the argument, the author allows readers to consider different perspectives and make their own informed opinions on the topic.
In a debate what is both sides trying to do?
In a debate, both sides are trying to persuade an audience of their respective viewpoints on a specific issue. Each side presents arguments, evidence, and counterpoints to strengthen their position while undermining the opposing side's claims. The ultimate goal is to convince the audience or judges of the validity and superiority of their arguments. Additionally, debaters aim to engage critically with the topic, demonstrating their understanding and analytical skills.
Animal rights and abuse?
Okay I cannot sum this up here so go onto the bbc and type that in and there is an excellent source of info and arguments for both sides.
If you have compeling arguments on both sides of the research question you may want to search for and take notes on what?
If you have compelling arguments on both sides of a research question, you may want to conduct a comprehensive literature review to explore existing research, gather data, and analyze different perspectives. Taking detailed notes on the key points, methodologies, and findings from various sources can help you gain a deeper understanding of the topic and identify common themes or gaps in the literature. This process can also help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each argument to develop a well-informed and balanced perspective on the research question.
