There are not two sides in the water pollution issue. By definition polluted water is water which is impaired for use. The "pollution is good" side on argument would then be reasons why it is good to ruin something valuable - it's hard to divine what these might be.
When doing research on compelling arguments for both sides of a research question, you should search for and take notes on the arguments for both sides.
The judge gives the speech is not a true statement about opening arguments. During opening arguments both sides of the case are given by the prosecutor and the defense lawyer.
The level of water pollution varies from water body to water body. Water pollution is a serious health threat for both animals and humans, potentially leading to sickness or even death.
Yes, a persuasive speech can incorporate arguments from both sides to present a comprehensive view of the topic. By addressing opposing viewpoints, the speaker can build credibility, demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject, and strengthen their own arguments by refuting counterarguments. However, it is important to ultimately take a stance and provide strong reasons for the audience to align with a particular perspective.
Citizens can hear arguments from both sides of an issue.
At a bench trial, the judge decides the sentence after hearing the evidence and arguments presented by both sides.
You can use both interchangeably but the effect of contamination by a specific chemical or biological matter is called pollution.
The objective of controlling water pollution is to safeguard life of both animals and plants since water is the source of life. Most human activities like the release of chemicals into the water bodies is one of the causes of water pollution.
A cliché is an overused phrase or it can be a stereotype. Both sides in the debate used cliché arguments that were weak.
extinction of species
I would choose both of them.
Water and air pollution are alike in that both result from the release of harmful substances into the environment, leading to negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and the overall balance of the environment. They can both be caused by human activities such as industrial processes, transportation, and agriculture, and require mitigation efforts to reduce their effects.