Good sociological research is characterized by rigorous methodology, clear objectives, and the ability to contribute meaningful insights to the field. It employs systematic data collection and analysis, ensuring validity and reliability of findings. In contrast, bad sociological research may rely on anecdotal evidence, lack a coherent framework, or produce biased conclusions, ultimately failing to advance understanding or inform policy. Additionally, poor research often disregards ethical standards, leading to questionable practices in data collection and participant treatment.
tcp/ip is good....
very good
They are both very good forms of research the main difference is the method in which the research is carried. In quantitative research there are more statistics involved. Everything is more mathematical in a sense, you're focused on the quantity. In qualitative research there is a focused on the quality of the work the questioning as to why things happen.
Hills and good weather.
there are differences between men and women good thing
Demons are Evil and Angels are good.
thre all good
they both rust and are good conducter of electricity
How were troubadours important for the development of music in the middle ages How did jongleurs support troubadours What were the differences between troubadours, trouveres, and minnesingers as a result of location
It's a good topic.
this depends on the fat, it is fat that is good and fat that is not good. the fat that is hard to get away is the bad one
whats good in wet market??????