answersLogoWhite

0

The general rule about individual rights and freedoms are, my rights stop when it infringes upon your rights. You have a right to free speech, but you cannot threaten someone. That is considered criminal. You cannot speak untruths as you could be sued for defamation of character, complete with possible damages. You cannot insight a riot or other violent, possibly injurous behavior. You are basically telling someone to hurt or injure someone else. That too is considered criminal behavior.

So, as long as you confine your right to free speech to comments or conversations, without threatening violence, insighting riots or lies, you should be fine.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which countries have absolute freedom of speech?

No country has absolute freedom of speech. Each country has its own laws and limitations on free speech, which can vary widely.


What are the advantages of preferred speech?

what are the advantages of speech? what are the limitations of speech?


What are the limitations and boundaries of freedom of speech in today's society?

The limitations and boundaries of freedom of speech in today's society are typically related to hate speech, incitement to violence, defamation, and threats. These restrictions aim to balance the right to free expression with the need to protect individuals and maintain social order.


In CA is there a statuete of limitations on freedom of speech amendment?

Freedom of Speech is guarenteed in the US Constitution. As such there is no statute of limitations associated with an amendment.


What protects your rights to free speech?

Freedom of Speech protects your rights to free speech.


What limitations does Congress have in restricting our freedom of speech?

Congress is limited in restricting freedom of speech by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to free speech. Congress cannot pass laws that violate this constitutional right, unless there is a compelling reason, such as national security or public safety.


When can government restric your right to free speech?

never its a free country you have a free speech..


Does the first amendment allow complete freedom of speech?

No, we have limited freedom of speech. This was discussed by the Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes who likened the limits on free speech to the yelling of "Fire" in a crowded theater when there was no fire. A citizen must responsibly limit his use of free speech to avoid endangering the innocent. Answer #2 In the PC world of today, there may be limitations on "hate speech" and there are laws against "inciting riots", etc. You also have to be careful of liable or slander.


When was Free Speech Coalition created?

Free Speech Coalition was created in 1991.


Supporter of free speech in the scopes trial?

Clarence Darrow was the supporter of free speech in the Scopes trial.


When would copyright be too restrictive?

Without the many limitations, defenses, and exceptions included in copyright law, it would prevent reasonable educational uses, commentary, and most importantly free speech.


Are there limitations on the right to freedom of speech?

Yes, there are limitations on the right to freedom of speech. It has never been held that the First Amendment protects all kinds of sppech. Some examples of proper limitations are: When speech creates a clear and present danger that it will create some evil which government has a right to prevent. The well-known examples here are shouting "Fire." in a crowded theater or publishing troopship movements in time of war. When speech directly results in a breach of the peace such as inciting to riot or using "fighting words." When speech constitutes libel or slander. When speech constitutes obscenity, but within a very narrow definition of obscenity. When speech is used as a criminal instrumentality, such as telling a person "Your money or your life", or making terroristic threats. When speech is used to commit fraud. When speech is used to communicate information to commit a crime, such as when several persons engage in conversation that amounts to criminal conspiracy to commit a crime or where the conversation enables several people to commit a crime. These are illustrations of some of the limitations on speech that are allowed even under the First Amendment.