0
They have reluctantly accepted that some people are born gay, but nevertheless have made the phrase "homosexual LIFESTYLE" all-pervasive to obscure the fact that some people are born gay. This is intended to cast doubt on the idea that some people are born homosexual. Nevertheless, they accept that homosexuality is an involuntary condition that some persons are born with, but claim that acting upon one's given homosexual nature is a 'sin'. This is incoherent, as it does not explain how acting on one's given nature is 'sinful' for some members of the species and 'good' for other members of the species. Not all of the human species is heterosexual but they assume that person must act as though it were. When discussing why consenting homosexual acts are 'sins', they fail to produce any victim of harm. The only explanation they have for why homosexuality is 'sinful' is a stigma that comes from outdated biblical passages written before it was understood that homosexuality is natural for some people. Protestants also attempt to stigmatize homosexuality by making bad analogies - suggesting, for example, that the homosexual condition (tendency) is to homosexual actions as ployamorous tendencies are to the act of bigamy. But polyamorous tendencies are not essential to one's nature - rather they are the WAY in which some heterosexuals want to express their inborn nature (heterosexuality). On other words, although one cannot help being heterosexual, one can nevertheless choose whether to express that nature in monogamous or polyamorous ways.
A better analogy would be to say that homosexual orientation is to homosexual actions as heterosexual orientation is to heterosexual actions. In both cases the orientation does not automatically indicate whether the associated actions are "good" or "evil" until we take into account the intentions of the agent. Just as not all homosexual acts are morally good, neither are all heterosexual acts morally good. In either case, the moral status of the act depends upon more than just the biological structure of the act. It depends upon consent, intention, etc..
What else can I help you with?
Is homosexuality permitted in Jewish scripture?
No. See Leviticus Chapters 18 & 20. However, most of the Liberal branches of Judaism accept homosexuality, in contravention to the Biblical word.
Protestant believers who strongly resisted liberal Protestants attempts to adapt to Darwinism?
I think that you could be referring to two groups, the Creationists or Intelligent Design folks, or the Fundamentalists. The Fundamentalists disagreed with several ideas of the liberal Protestants, not just evolution. Some of the areas of conflict were what it means to say the Bible is inspired, whether Christ was born of a virgin, and whether or not Christ is fully divine.
What extent does socialisation contribute to homosexuality?
Socialisation does not contribute to homosexuality, although some authors seem to think it does.
What does a newborn Christian think about homosexuality?
Some moderate born-again Christians think homosexuality itself is not a sin and is akin to heterosexuality and governed by the same biblical rules about lust, love, loyalty in relationships. Other born-again Christians are fundamentalists who believe that homosexuality is a sin. I don't know what newborns think about homosexuality or if they can be Christian.
What does the church of the Nazarene think about homosexuality?
The Church of the Nazarene regards homosexuality as a sin, and generally opposes LGBT rights.
What do baptist think of homosexuality?
very big sin
What does John corvino think about homosexuality?
I guess he is find with it
Why did they think the Medici passed homosexuality to Michelangelo?
Who on earth has had such a thought?
What does Noel Jones think about homosexuality?
Noel Jones has never clearly stated his views on homosexuality.Noel Jones has never clearly stated his views on homosexuality.
Is Judge Matt Lucas a liberal or conservative?
Liberal i think
Is being gay liberal or conservative?
It doesn't matter whether you are gay or not, in order be consider yourself liberal or conservative. Usually, conservatives have more moral objections to homosexuality, whether it is openly displayed or not. Liberals tends to be a bit more open-minded when it comes to homosexuality. Of course there are exceptions to be found in both groups. A liberal person can be liberal about things like euthanasia and abortion, and won't support gay marriage. Conservatives can maitain a very conservative policy towards politics or economics, and find less objections to supporting gay marriage or other similar issues.
Do protestants think that it's a good idea to die for religion?
No
