Someone saying that means that rights can be restricted or taken away if they are abused. For instance, the right to bear arms, guaranteed in the constitution, is taken away for convicted felons. The right to freedom (at least in body) is restricted when someone commits a crime and is incarcerated. Rights under the law aren't absolute when people start violating other people's rights.
No. The absolute value is non-negative but, to be pedantic, that does not mean positive. The absolute value of 0 is 0 which is NOT positive.
A slave- in ANY state- was considered property. Property does not have rights.
Rights that can not be taken away by any government.
The mean deviation of any set of numbers is always zero and so the absolute mean deviation is also always zero.
she was considered an outsider because Ruth was from Moab, and had no property rights because she was a widow and did not have any children.
she was considered an outsider because Ruth was from Moab, and had no property rights because she was a widow and did not have any children.
she was considered an outsider because Ruth was from Moab, and had no property rights because she was a widow and did not have any children.
Because they need to be adjusted for any new facts that we learn.
Yes. Suleiman was not restrained by any constitution or congress. He was an absolute monarch. The only opposition to Suleiman came occasionally from the Janissaries.
In a Dictatorship the people have no rights.
Inalienable means unable to be taken away or given up. It refers to rights and freedoms that are considered inherent and unable to be revoked by any outside force.
If you mean something like: | x | = -1 That has no solution. The absolute value of any expression on the inside of the absolute value bars can only be zero or positive.