They were willing to give up privacy for safety. Many Americans are for the goverment monitoring citizens phone calls, emails, etc. They were for the establishment of security cameras in many public places so that suspicious behaviour could be monitored.
I agree with the statement that those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither, as it highlights the fundamental value of personal freedoms in a democratic society. Sacrificing liberty in the name of security can lead to authoritarianism and the erosion of individual rights. True security comes from a society that respects and upholds freedoms, allowing individuals to participate in their governance and express dissent. Balancing liberty and security is crucial, but compromising core freedoms can ultimately jeopardize both.
The phrase "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither" suggests that when individuals willingly give up their freedoms in exchange for perceived safety, they undermine the very principles of liberty that protect them. It implies that true security cannot be achieved at the cost of personal freedoms, and that compromising fundamental rights can lead to a loss of both liberty and security. Essentially, it serves as a warning against the dangers of authoritarianism and the erosion of civil liberties in the name of safety.
is the social security check you get in September for the month of August
the department of homeland security
All security mechanisms do. It's better to sacrifice couple percents of your bandwidth for secure connection especially if the network is used to access bank accounts, business and so on.
A blanky is another term for a blanket, especially one used as a security blanket.
Kenyan citizens have certain personal freedoms enshrined in their constitution, such as the freedom of expression, assembly, and movement. However, there are some limitations on these freedoms, particularly related to national security concerns and public order. Enforcement and protection of personal freedoms can vary in practice.
SECURITY!
Hobbes' theory, articulated in his work "Leviathan," posits that in the state of nature, individuals experience constant fear and conflict, leading to chaos. To escape this turmoil, people agree to surrender certain freedoms to a sovereign authority in exchange for protection and the establishment of law and order. This social contract ensures security and stability, as the government maintains peace and prevents the return to a state of nature. Thus, individuals accept limitations on their freedoms for the greater benefit of societal order.
Part of the reason SAIC fared especially well after September 11 was that Beyster had established the company's technical expertise in terrorist investigations and homeland security in 1993, following the first bombing of New York's World Trade Center
The attacks on September 11
The Department of Homeland Security