The general doctrine courts follow is called "fruit of the poison tree."
If a defendant's rights were violated, then any evidence deriving either directly or indirectly from that violation is inadmissible in court. The violation "poisons" the evidence obtained illegally and any other evidence discovered as a result.
It is not, however, a "get out of jail free" card. If the police illegally search your home without a warrant and find heroin there, they cannot use that as evidence. They can, however, use the surveillance video taken of you two weeks ago showing you selling heroin in the park that made them want to search your home in the first place as evidence.
rights that should not be abridged by governments, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
yes when it involves school newspapers
Ideas about which rights are inalienable have varied widely.
He extended Civil Rights to women. That is Civil rights could not be abridged based on gender.
The Proposed Equal Rights Amendment
The Bill of Rights was created to protect the rights of the individual citizens of the United States. It mandates that every individual is protected by certain rights that may not be abridged by the government.
rights that should not be abridged by governments, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. study island ;)
Smaller groups, such as gays and lesbians, have been slow in pursuing their civil rights claims. This has started to change in recent years.
Never. You get a domestic violence conviction, you lose your firearms rights. It's that simple.
In California, gun rights aren't taken away for a PC 415(1) misdemeanor conviction.
Yes, in some circumstances you can have some rights restored, but you should check with an attorney.
Have your record expunged or the conviction overturned.