BIOLOGICAL
A nuclear incident would have a great impact on the environment and people, but would be the least likely to occur.Several people answered "biological", but I would question the "least likely" aspect. A nuclear incident would have a greater effect on the environment compared to a biological incident.
A nuclear incident would have a great impact on the environment and people, but would be the least likely to occur.Several people answered "biological", but I would question the "least likely" aspect. A nuclear incident would have a greater effect on the environment compared to a biological incident.
A nuclear incident would have a great impact on the environment and people, but would be the least likely to occur.Several people answered "biological", but I would question the "least likely" aspect. A nuclear incident would have a greater effect on the environment compared to a biological incident.
A nuclear incident would have a great impact on the environment and people, but would be the least likely to occur.Several people answered "biological", but I would question the "least likely" aspect. A nuclear incident would have a greater effect on the environment compared to a biological incident.
BIOLOGICAL
BIOLOGICAL
In which country are the people least likely to change their physical environment?
When the people in your social environment are supportive, caring, and respectful, you are likely to feel _____ to them
Tornadoes can impact the environment by damaging tor destroying vegetation and animal habitats. They impact humans by damaging or destroying their property and killing or injuring the people themselves.
it helps you live and breath
They impact humans by flooding homes and can also kill people. It hurts the environment by ruining lands and can make trees fall
A:It is hard to find a reason why non-religious people are less likely to care about the environment, particularly in the face of anecdotal evidence that care for the environment is more likely to be strong among non-religious people. While we can all hold biased positions on this, an objective view that non-religious people are less likely to care about the environment requires provable evidence, and there appears to be none.