A good counterargument for pollution is that economic development often necessitates some level of environmental sacrifice, as industries generate jobs and contribute to social progress. Proponents argue that technological advancements can mitigate pollution, enabling economic growth while addressing environmental concerns. Additionally, some may claim that stringent regulations can stifle innovation and competitiveness, ultimately harming the economy. Thus, a balance must be struck between environmental protection and economic growth.
when the counterargument has a relevant point
Me and my friend had a counterargument on clothes and shoes.
Shopping online, check on geartaker.com, worldwide free airmail shipping!
saying no
it means that when someone says for example: that vegetables are yucky. so the counter argument for that is that they are good for you. so a counter argument is the other side of the argument! hope you understand now! ;-)
to anticipate the reader's concerns and help to alleviate them
no there is not pollution is bad for the inirnment
It's Not Good For You
counterargument, dissent, rejoinder, retort, dissidence...
All of the above
8
pollution is the steam that comes out of a train