Miranda rights
The question is not exactly stated correctly. ARRESTED persons must be advised of their right to an attorney BEFORE questioning begins or any information derived from un-advised questioning can be challenged and found inadmissable.
Miranda Warnings (Rights) should be read at any time someone is being arrested and before questioning. Your warning not only tells you that you have the right to remain silent during ANY and ALL questioning but that you have the right to an attorney present during any and all questioning. Lastly, it also points out to a suspect that If they're indigent (poor) they have the constitutional right to a public defender.
It generally depends on your country.Many countries do caution people during arrest and before questioning, but not all of them do.This is called a police caution or, in some countries, the Miranda rights.Countries in which law enforcement must caution suspects by law are:AustraliaBangladeshCanadaAny member of the European Union (EU)England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland. And including all overseas territories owned by Britain (and as an EU member)France (and as an EU member)Germany (and as an EU member)Netherlands (and as an EU member)Spain (and as an EU member)Hong KongIsraelNew ZealandPhilippinesSwitzerlandThailandUkraineUnited States
What is the practice of holding dangerous suspects before trail without bail
Just before you sleep
Not really all that much actually, except that now, before custodial interrogation begins, the arrestee must be specifically advised of their Constitutional rights. Customarily they are advised of their rights at the time of arrest, BUT if the arrestee is not subjected to any questioning in the field, no 'fatal' error has occurred if it isn't actually done until they are questioned at the stattion. It is not unusual for an arrestee to be advised multiple times just to assure that they HAVE been advised according to law.
Miranda Rights
.
The term "Miranda rights" comes from the 1966 case Miranda v. Arizona. This case determined that a confession obtained by rough interrogation was inadmissible. The rights that Mr.Miranda should have been made aware of were compiled and now must be read to suspects before questioning.
before, during, and after reading
Yes, before you act guilty and she suspects you
The constitutional issues at stake in Miranda v. Arizona were the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The case established the requirement for law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights, known as the Miranda rights, before questioning them.