Swiggity swooty im coming for your booty
Residual social welfare views social welfare as a safety net for those who cannot support themselves through personal efforts or the market. Institutional social welfare views social welfare as a fundamental right and responsibility of the state to ensure the overall well-being of its citizens through comprehensive programs and services.
The New Deal welfare state
Functionalists view social welfare as a system that provides support for individuals in society, ensuring social stability and cohesion. They see it as a mechanism to address social inequalities and maintain the overall functioning of society by meeting the needs of its members.
A welfare index is a statistical measure that assesses the well-being of individuals or populations, often incorporating various indicators such as income, health, education, and living conditions. It is used to evaluate the effectiveness of social policies and programs aimed at improving quality of life. By aggregating multiple dimensions of welfare, the index provides a comprehensive view of social progress and disparities within a community or country.
(For Apex Learning) All of the above. (Controlling the economy, deciding when to use the military, & providing social welfare programs.)
Residual view of social welfarebased on the idea that governments should play only a limited role in the distribution of social welfare. The assumption is that the majority of the population will be able to locate their own sources of assistance, whether through the market mechanism of work, or from family and perhaps church or charity. The state should only step in when the normal sources of support fail and the individual is unable to help themselves.The institutional concept of welfare see social welfare programs as protecting individuals in society from the social costs of operating an industrialized capitalist market, rather than letting those costs fall on those who experience the risks of industrial society. Need is established based on the fact of need, without consideration of the cause of need.
Antitrust legislation aims at increasing social welfare and competition.Another View: Anti-trust legislation has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with social programs. They are laws to prevent large companies, or combinations of companies, from banding together to control the flow of goods or services and thereby control prices of a particular product or products to the detriment of the consuming public.
Antitrust legislation aims at increasing social welfare and competition.Another View: Anti-trust legislation has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with social programs. They are laws to prevent large companies, or combinations of companies, from banding together to control the flow of goods or services and thereby control prices of a particular product or products to the detriment of the consuming public.
Franklin D. Roosevelt's speeches often reflected a progressive point of view that emphasized the role of government in addressing societal challenges, promoting economic recovery, and advocating for social welfare programs. His speeches typically focused on the need for collective action, the importance of individual rights and freedoms, and the idea of unity and solidarity among Americans during times of crisis.
The institutional view is generally considered preferable because it aims to prevent poverty and social issues by providing comprehensive support systems, such as healthcare and education, to all members of society. In contrast, the residual view only provides benefits to those who fall into poverty or crisis, which can lead to gaps in coverage and perpetuate inequalities.
Unfortunately, the view of Radical Republican prevailed in Reconstruction.
Critics argue that the Republican Party often prioritizes corporate interests over social welfare, leading to policies that may exacerbate income inequality and neglect public services. Additionally, the party has faced criticism for its stance on social issues, which some view as exclusionary or regressive. Furthermore, the party's approach to climate change and environmental regulations is seen by many as inadequate, potentially threatening long-term sustainability. These factors contribute to a perception that the party may not fully represent the diverse needs of all Americans.