If a plant did not have carbon dioxide (CO2), it would be unable to perform photosynthesis, the process by which it converts light energy into chemical energy to produce glucose and oxygen. Without CO2, the plant would lack the essential carbon source needed for growth and energy, leading to stunted development, yellowing leaves, and ultimately, death. Additionally, the absence of photosynthesis would disrupt the balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the environment, affecting other organisms that rely on plants for oxygen.
The plant would die. Plants need co2 to make oxygen which humans and animals need to exist.
it Will die
the plant without leaves would die, because there is no space for Co2 to be absorbed, and no place for sunlight to enter, and no place for the oxygen to escape :) source: School, biology books and wikipedia
Co2 levels will rise as a result of both animal and plant respiration
if theres no co2 all the plants will die because they need CO2 (and sunlight) to do photosynthesis
If CO2 was removed from a plant's environment, it would not be able to perform photosynthesis, which is the process essential for producing energy to survive. This lack of CO2 would lead to a decrease in plant growth, as well as a reduction in the production of oxygen that is released during photosynthesis. Ultimately, the plant would likely struggle to survive without this crucial component of its metabolic processes.
Your throat will get soar, nothing will happen to the plant.
A child breathing out would provide CO2, which is used by the plant in photosynthesis.
If there were no carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air, photosynthesis would cease, as plants rely on CO2 to produce oxygen and food. This would lead to a collapse of ecosystems dependent on plant life, severely diminishing the food supply for herbivores and, subsequently, carnivores. Additionally, the Earth's temperature would drop significantly, as CO2 plays a crucial role in trapping heat in the atmosphere. Overall, the absence of CO2 would disrupt the balance of life on Earth and could lead to a mass extinction event.
The Calvin cycle will produce less glucose.
I assume you have the Holt, Rinehart and Winston worksheets.So your question was :'If the RuBP consumed in Step 1 was not regenerated in Step 4 of the Calvin Cycle, then,a. CO2 would stop diffusing into the stroma.b. the cycle would speed up because of an increase in CO2 molecules.c. the plant cell would lack G3P molecules.d. the plant cell would stop bonding carbon atoms from CO2 into organic compoundsThe two you can immediately cross out are A and B because diffusion of CO2 has nothing to do with RuBP. As for B, the cycle would not speed up. If anything, it would slow down or stop.Now, we are left with:c. the plant cell would lack G3P molecules.d. the plant cell would stop bonding carbon atoms from CO2 into organic compoundsThe article you read on the front sheet [I will not copy that down] never specified much on whether or not the cell would stop bonding carbon atoms from CO2 into organic compounds, so I personally settled for C. My reasoning behind this is that G3P is made from RuBP, and without it, the cell, like the answer states would lack G3P.TL;DR the answer is 'D'I do hope this helped. Good luck with Bio!Edit: answer is D
I think a plant would need CO2, and something else.