Reduction at source is always the most efficient mean of conservation. By re-think the water usage activity, consider how the pollutant would leak out and require the water cleaning and reduce the leak would yield lesser water consumption and net amount of pollutant release.
It must be noted, waste water doesn't imply the water to be dirty or filled with germ. Water from internal vessel cleaning could be recovered and add back to the mixer of the same product formula long as it is not contaminated with other waste water. For this case, both the water and product is recover and result to net reduce of pollution.
Conserving energy resources reduces the amount of fossil fuels that are burned, which reduces air pollution. Reductions in fossil fuel consumption would reduce the need for petroleum and natural gas drilling, as well as the need for coal mining. Reducing these activities would reduce water and land pollution.
smog
It reduces the Life span.
Sanitary Landfill
unleaded
As humans, we can reduce air pollution by limiting our use of energy and polluntants.
Yes gasohol reduces air pollution. It burns cleaner than gasoline.
100%
terracing
There are many advantages to recycling materials. Some main advantages are that it protects the environment, reduces energy consumption, and reduces pollution.
If you conserve, or save a resource, then that resource does not have to be manufactured as much because we are re-using it. For example, if we conserve paper, recycle carboard and newspaper, then there is less of a need for the cutting of trees and manufacturing of the paper products. This protects the forest habitat. Also, the manufacturing process creates pollution, so it also cuts back on pollution as well. The same concept applies for conserving plastics, oil, water, etc.
Carbondioxide and Carbonmonoxide.