answersLogoWhite

0

The threat of a boycott was prominently featured in the 1955 Montgomery Resolution, which arose during the Civil Rights Movement in response to racial segregation on public buses in Montgomery, Alabama. Activists, led by figures like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr., called for a boycott of the city's bus system as a means to protest the unjust treatment of African Americans. This collective action sought to exert economic pressure on the city to demand change and ultimately led to significant legal and social advancements in civil rights.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which resolution contained the threat of a boycott?

Wheh


The two folds of the Muslim threat to Europe?

Explain the "two folds" of the Muslin threat to Europe


What was the reaction of white American in Montgomery to the buss boycott?

The reaction of white Americans in Montgomery to the bus boycott was largely one of hostility and resistance. Many white residents, including local officials, viewed the boycott as a threat to the established social order and reacted with anger, implementing measures to undermine the boycott and maintain segregation. Some white citizens organized counter-protests and sought to intimidate those participating in the boycott. Overall, the boycott intensified racial tensions and highlighted the deep divisions within the community.


The UAE population is becoming increasingly diverse Explain how could this phenomenon be a threat as well as an opportunity for marketers?

answer me the question please. The U.A.E. population is becoming increasingly diverse. Explain how could this phenomenon be a threat as well as an opportunity for marketers?


What is the resolution of mortal engines?

In "Mortal Engines," the resolution revolves around the themes of redemption and the consequences of a world shaped by war and technology. The protagonists, Tom and Hester, confront the looming threat of the Anti-Traction League and the destructive potential of the weaponized city of London. By the end, they manage to unite their efforts to thwart this threat, highlighting the importance of cooperation and understanding. The resolution emphasizes hope for a future where humanity can coexist without the destructive cycles of the past.


What is war powers of resolution?

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. ) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.


Which barrier to communication is defined as those factors contained within the sender or receiver which can lead to feelings of anxiety frustration or threat and causes distortion of the message?

Psychological


What word means to refuse to have anything to do with?

Politically, it is isolationism. Which is all well and good, until the isolations become in need from outside help and their isolationist's concept may not appear so attractive when under threat.


Is WikiLeaks a threat to national security?

Some documents that were leaked contained sensitive references to foreign heads of state. This could anger them into taking revenge on us, or worse. So to answer your question, yes, WikiLeaks can very well be a threat to U.S. National Security.


Explain two ways humans may be a threat to animals?

hunting them or damaging their habitat,both can lead to reduced numbers


Is it legal to threaten legal action in a dispute resolution process?

It is generally legal to threaten legal action in a dispute resolution process, as long as the threat is made in good faith and based on legitimate legal grounds. However, it is important to be cautious and consider the potential consequences of making such threats, as they could escalate the situation and harm the chances of reaching a resolution amicably.


What is definition of war powers resolution?

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. ) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.