Yes they did. Abraham Lincoln banned slavery from slave states that included California.
Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery, and to forgive the states that were defeated.
Lincoln was at first undecided about slavery. Later on, his views were that all men were created equal and slavery had not place in the US.
Yes, hence why he issued the emancipation proclamation
All of the Union states that allowed slavery before the war were not affected by Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation.
Because Lincoln had not been elected on an Abolitionist ticket. All he said was that he would not allow any extension of slavery. So the Crittenden Compromise was acceptable in its recognition of existing slave-states, but not in its provision for possible new slave-states.
Both had a strong position in the Anti Slavery debate. They both were against slavery and agreed that there should be no more slave states.
HE ABOLISHED SLAVERY
In fact Lincoln owned slaves and viewed himself as a farmer or common man. Lincoln did not want to ban slavery on states that served as buffers between the Union and Confederacy states because the Confederacy would be able to attack easier its a battle strategy. Lincoln was more concerned with saving the Union at all cost than banning slavery
Both had a strong position in the Anti Slavery debate. They both were against slavery and agreed that there should be no more slave states.
It caused the south to secede in order to keep their slavery alive .
The Crittenden Compromise was impossible for Abraham Lincoln to even consider. First of all it called for permanent slavery in the slave states with no chance of repeal once it was enacted. The Republicans were adamantly opposed to the expansion of slavery.