A translation does not preserve the orientation of a figure because it simply shifts the entire figure in a specific direction without changing its shape or size. While the relative positions of the points within the figure remain consistent, the overall orientation can be perceived differently, especially in relation to other figures or coordinate axes. For example, if a triangle is translated, its vertices move to new locations, potentially altering its alignment with respect to a reference frame, which affects the perceived orientation.
Yes, it does.
They change the orientation.
All three are preserved.
A rigid transformation that does not result in a reversed orientation of the original image is a translation or a rotation. Both transformations preserve the orientation of the figure, meaning that the shape and arrangement of points remain unchanged. In contrast, a reflection is the rigid transformation that reverses the orientation.
The orientation of figure L would remain unchanged after a translation of 8 units to the right and 3 units up. Translation moves a figure without altering its shape, size, or direction. Thus, while the position of figure L will change, its orientation will stay the same.
The same figure. A translation simply moves the figure somewhere else, without changing its shape or size.
It is moved across the plane. Its size or orientation are not changed.
A translation will slide a figure either horizontally, vertically, or both, without changing its orientation or shape. The position of every point on the figure is shifted by the same amount and in the same direction.
This is a transformation which could be a rotation, translation or reflection.
No, translating a figure does not change its orientation. Translation involves moving a figure from one position to another without altering its shape, size, or direction. The figure maintains its original alignment and angles throughout the process.
Rotation, in the plane of the grid, through 180 degrees.
no